Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18026951›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008

Human tankyrases are aberrantly expressed in colon tumors and contain multiple epitopes that induce humoral and cellular immune responses in cancer patients.

Yuriy V Shebzukhov, Inna N Lavrik, Julia Karbach, Svetlana V Khlgatian, Ekaterina P Koroleva, Pavel V Belousov, Kirill N Kashkin, Alexander Knuth, Elke Jager, Nai-Wen Chi and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genetic variation in telomere maintenance genes in relation to ovarian cancer survival.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yuriy V ShebzukhovDepartment of Molecular Immunology, Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Vorobjovy Gory, Moscow 119899, Russia.
Inna N Lavrik
Julia Karbach
Svetlana V Khlgatian
Ekaterina P Koroleva
Pavel V Belousov
Kirill N Kashkin
Alexander Knuth
Elke Jager
Nai-Wen Chi
Dmitry V Kuprash
Sergei A Nedospasov
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTankyrases 1 and 2 are telomere-associated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP) that can positively regulate telomere elongation and interact with multiple cellular proteins. Recent reports implicated tankyrases as tumor antigens and potential targets of anticancer treatment. We examined expression of tankyrases in colon tumors and immune response to these enzymes in patients with different types of cancer.

methodsmRNA and protein expression was evaluated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively. Humoral immune response to recombinant tankyrases was investigated by modified enzyme-linked immunoassays. Cellular immune response was analysed by ELISPOT and (51)Cr release assays.

resultsWe found that both mRNA and protein levels of tankyrase 2 (TNKL) are upregulated in colon tumors. In contrast, protein level of tankyrase 1 (TNKS) is downregulated, while mRNA level shows variable changes. More than a quarter of colon cancer patients develop humoral immune response to at least one of the two tankyrases. In this study we mapped common and unique B-cell epitopes located in different domains of the two proteins. Additionally, we present evidence for T-cell responses both to epitopes that are unique for TNKL and to those shared between TNKL and TNKS.

conclusionOur study favors a biomarker usage of antibody response to tankyrases. Spontaneous CD8(+) T-cell responses to these enzymes are rare and further investigation is needed to evaluate tankyrases as potential targets for cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antibody FormationImmunity, CellularAmino Acid SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesColonic NeoplasmsEpitope MappingEpitopesHumansImmunotherapyMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasmsSequence Homology, Amino AcidTankyrasesBiomarkers, TumorEpitopesTankyrasesTNKS2 protein, humanTNKS protein, human

Identifiers

PMID18026951
PMCPMC11030928
OpenAlexW2168477456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.