Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18025269›Full record

ArticleGenome research2008

MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes.

Brandi L Cantarel, Ian Korf, Sofia M C Robb, Genis Parra, Eric Ross, Barry Moore, Carson Holt, Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado, Mark Yandell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,228 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,228citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,228 citing papers in PubMed, 2,130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assemblies ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,168 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandi L CantarelEccles Institute of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Ian Korf
Sofia M C Robb
Genis Parra
Eric Ross
Barry Moore
Carson Holt
Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
Mark Yandell
University of Utah · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
COMPARATIVE GENOMICS AND GENE PREDICTIONK22HG000064 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KORF, IAN F · 2001 to 2006
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG000064NHGRI NIH HHS K22-HG0064NIGMS NIH HHS 5 T32 GM007464NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a portable and easily configurable genome annotation pipeline called MAKER. Its purpose is to allow investigators to independently annotate eukaryotic genomes and create genome databases. MAKER identifies repeats, aligns ESTs and proteins to a genome, produces ab initio gene predictions, and automatically synthesizes these data into gene annotations having evidence-based quality indices. MAKER is also easily trainable: Outputs of preliminary runs are used to automatically retrain its gene-prediction algorithm, producing higher-quality gene-models on subsequent runs. MAKER's inputs are minimal, and its outputs can be used to create a GMOD database. Its outputs can also be viewed in the Apollo Genome browser; this feature of MAKER provides an easy means to annotate, view, and edit individual contigs and BACs without the overhead of a database. As proof of principle, we have used MAKER to annotate the genome of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea and to create a new genome database, SmedGD. We have also compared MAKER's performance to other published annotation pipelines. Our results demonstrate that MAKER provides a simple and effective means to convert a genome sequence into a community-accessible genome database. MAKER should prove especially useful for emerging model organism genome projects for which extensive bioinformatics resources may not be readily available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAnimalsGenome, HelminthTurbellaria

Identifiers

PMID18025269
PMCPMC2134774
OpenAlexW2168292723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.