Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18022922›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2007

Genetic analysis of Indian subjects with clinical features of possible type IIa hypercholesterolemia.

Altaf A Kondkar, Kappiareth G Nair, Tester F Ashavaid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Altaf A KondkarPD Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Research Laboratories, VS Marg, Mumbai, India.
Kappiareth G Nair
Tester F Ashavaid

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed genetic analysis in 55 patients with clinical features of possible type IIa hypercholesterolemia and 76 normolipemic healthy subjects for mutations and polymorphisms in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B-100 (APOB), apolipoprotein E (APOE), and hepatic lipase (LIPC) genes to elucidate the important genetic factors that can influence cholesterol levels in our population. None of the subjects showed mutations in part of exon 26 of the APOB gene, whereas two class 5 mutations were identified in exon 9 of the LDLR gene. First, an E387K mutation was observed in a Gujarati family in which both the parents were heterozygous for the mutation. Second, a L393R mutation was observed in a 38-year-old female. We found no correlation between LIPC -514C/T genotypes and cholesterol levels whereas the apoepsilon4 allele frequency was significantly higher in cases and the apoE4 genotype was found to influence total cholesterol levels.

Indexed as

AdultApolipoproteins EFemaleHumansHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIIndiaLipidsLipoproteinsMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, LDLApolipoproteins ELipidsLipoproteinsReceptors, LDL

Identifiers

PMID18022922
PMCPMC6649063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.