Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18006927›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2007

Haplotype of N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 and risk of pancreatic cancer.

Li Jiao, Mark A Doll, David W Hein, Melissa L Bondy, Manal M Hassan, James E Hixson, James L Abbruzzese, Donghui Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. BioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  3. NAT1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Functional effects of genetic polymorphisms in the N-acetyltransferase 1 coding and 3' untranslated regions.Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology · 2011
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li JiaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Mark A Doll
David W Hein
Melissa L Bondy
Manal M Hassan
James E Hixson
James L Abbruzzese
Donghui Li
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Louisville · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Pilot Project ProgramP30ES007784 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI RICHIE, ELLEN R · 1996 to 2011
$16.4M
PHARMACOGENETICS OF DRUG &CARCINOGEN METABOLISMR01CA034627 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI HEIN, DAVID W · 1985 to 2009
$3.1M
Molecular Epidemiology of Pancreatic CancerR01CA098380 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, DONGHUI · 2004 to 2008
$2.6M
GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY--CARCINOGENS IN PANCREATIC CANCERR03CA084581 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, DONGHUI · 2000 to 2001
$151k
NCI NIH HHS CA16672NCI NIH HHS CA34627NCI NIH HHS CA84581NCI NIH HHS CA98380NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA034627NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098380NCI NIH HHS R03 CA084581NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007784NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES07784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the association between N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 (NAT1 and NAT2) haplotype and risk of pancreatic cancer by genotyping eight NAT1 and seven NAT2 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 532 patients and in 581 healthy controls (all non-Hispanic white) who were recruited at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from January 2000 to December 2006. Haplotypes were reconstructed by using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by using unconditional logistic regression models. Covariates included age (continuous variable), sex, pack-year of smoking (categorical), and history of diabetes when appropriate. NAT1 and NAT2 genotype was mutually adjusted. The prevalence of haplotype NAT1*10-NAT2*6A was 4.3% versus 2.7% (P=0.06) and NAT1*11-NAT2*6A was 1.2% versus 0.4% (P=0.05) in patients and controls, respectively. The diplotype NAT1*10/*10 or NAT1*10/*11 and NAT2*6A/any slow allele was associated with a higher risk of pancreatic cancer compared with other diplotypes (multivariate odds ratio, 4.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-15.00; P=0.03). NAT2 slow genotype were associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer among heavy smokers and among individuals with a history of diabetes. We for the first time found that rare NAT1*10 or NAT1*11-NAT2*6A diplotype may be an "at-risk" genetic variant for pancreatic cancer. The NAT2*6A/any slow acetylation genotype may be a predisposing factor for pancreatic cancer among diabetics with smoking exposure. Our observations must be confirmed in larger independent studies.

Indexed as

AdultArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseFemaleGenotypeHaplotypesHumansIsoenzymesMalePancreatic NeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsArylamine N-AcetyltransferaseIsoenzymesN-acetyltransferase 1NAT2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID18006927
PMCPMC2215308
OpenAlexW2076073316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.