Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18005429›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2007

Folate augmentation of treatment - evaluation for depression (FolATED): protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Seren Haf Roberts, Emma Bedson, Dyfrig Hughes, Keith Lloyd, David B Menkes, Stuart Moat, Munir Pirmohamed, Gary Slegg, Johannes Thome, Richard Tranter and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00514410 (Folate Augmentation of Treatment - Evaluation for Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00514410 phase4completednot on this map

Folate Augmentation of Treatment - Evaluation for Depression: a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangor UniversityRan2007 to 2011Enrolled730ConditionsDepressionArmsFolic Acid, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Placebo treatment in mild to moderate depression.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Menkes, David B [added]; Thome, Johannes [added]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Seren Haf RobertsNorth Wales Section of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research (IMSCaR), Bangor University, Academic Unit, Wrexham Technology Park, Wrexham, LL13 7YP, UK. seren.roberts@new-tr.wales.nhs.uk
Emma Bedson
Dyfrig Hughes
Keith Lloyd
David B Menkes
Stuart Moat
Munir Pirmohamed
Gary Slegg
Johannes Thome
Richard Tranter
Rhiannon Whitaker
Clare Wilkinson
Ian Russell
Bangor University · GBCardiff University · GBSwansea University · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWrexham University · GBYsbyty Gwynedd Hospital NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical depression is common, debilitating and treatable; one in four people experience it during their lives. The majority of sufferers are treated in primary care and only half respond well to active treatment. Evidence suggests that folate may be a useful adjunct to antidepressant treatment: 1) patients with depression often have a functional folate deficiency; 2) the severity of such deficiency, indicated by elevated homocysteine, correlates with depression severity, 3) low folate is associated with poor antidepressant response, and 4) folate is required for the synthesis of neurotransmitters implicated in the pathogenesis and treatment of depression. METHODS/

designThe primary objective of this trial is to estimate the effect of folate augmentation in new or continuing treatment of depressive disorder in primary and secondary care. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of folate augmentation of antidepressant treatment, investigate how the response to antidepressant treatment depends on genetic polymorphisms relevant to folate metabolism and antidepressant response, and explore whether baseline folate status can predict response to antidepressant treatment. Seven hundred and thirty patients will be recruited from North East Wales, North West Wales and Swansea. Patients with moderate to severe depression will be referred to the trial by their GP or Psychiatrist. If patients consent they will be assessed for eligibility and baseline measures will be undertaken. Blood samples will be taken to exclude patients with folate and B12 deficiency. Some of the blood taken will be used to measure homocysteine levels and for genetic analysis (with additional consent). Eligible participants will be randomised to receive 5 mg of folic acid or placebo. Patients with B12 deficiency or folate deficiency will be given appropriate treatment and will be monitored in the 'comprehensive cohort study'. Assessments will be at screening, randomisation and 3 subsequent follow-ups. DISCUSSION: If folic acid is shown to improve the efficacy of antidepressants, then it will provide a safe, simple and cheap way of improving the treatment of depression in primary and secondary care.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN37558856.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDepressive DisorderDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFamily PracticeFemaleFluoxetineFolic AcidFollow-Up StudiesHomocysteineHumansMalePsychiatryAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationFluoxetineFolic AcidHomocysteine

Identifiers

PMID18005429
PMCPMC2238748
OpenAlexW2020469036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.