ArticleGene therapy2008
Viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens: a possible involvement of T-cell competition.
Article in Gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination Immunotherapy with Vaccine and Oncolytic HSV Virotherapy Is Time Dependent.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2024Article
- Cancer vaccine strategies using self-replicating RNA viral platforms.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Applications for Oncolytic Self-Replicating RNA Viruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Short or Long Interval between Priming and Boosting: Does It Impact on the Vaccine Immunogenicity?Vaccines · 2021Article
- First-in-Human Phase I Clinical Trial of an SFV-Based RNA Replicon Cancer Vaccine against HPV-Induced Cancers.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021Article
- An alphavirus-based therapeutic cancer vaccine: from design to clinical trial.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2019Review
- A rationally designed combined treatment with an alphavirus-based cancer vaccine, sunitinib and low-dose tumor irradiation completely blocks tumor development.Oncoimmunology · 2015Article
- From tumor immunosuppression to eradication: targeting homing and activity of immune effector cells to tumors.Clinical & developmental immunology · 2011Review
- Article
- Immunological and clinical effects of vaccines targeting p53-overexpressing malignancies.Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccination with recombinant viral vectors may be impeded by preexisting vector-specific immunity or by vector-specific immunity induced during the priming immunization. It is assumed that virus-neutralizing antibodies represent the principal effector mechanism of vector-specific immunity, while killing of infected cells by vector-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) has also been suggested. Using recombinant Semliki Forest virus (rSFV) expressing E6E7 antigen from human papillomavirus, we demonstrate that secondary immune responses against E6E7 are neither affected by vector-specific antibodies nor by CTL-mediated killing of infected cells. Instead, the presence of the antigen during the prime immunization appeared to be the main determinant for the boosting efficacy. After priming with rSFVeE6,7, a homologous booster stimulated the primed E6E7-specific CTL response and induced long-lasting memory. Passively transferred SFV-neutralizing antibodies did not inhibit E6E7-specific CTL responses, although transgene expression was strongly reduced under these conditions. Conversely, in mice primed with irrelevant rSFV, induction of E6E7-specific CTLs was inhibited presumably due to vector-specific responses induced by the priming immunization. When during the priming with irrelevant rSFV, E7-protein was co-administered, the inhibitory effect of vector-specific immunity was abolished. These results suggest that, apart from vector-specific antibodies or killing of infected cells, T-cell competition may be involved in determining the efficacy of viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.