Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18004406›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2008

Viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens: a possible involvement of T-cell competition.

A de Mare, A J A Lambeck, J Regts, G M van Dam, H W Nijman, H Snippe, J Wilschut, T Daemen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic Applications for Oncolytic Self-Replicating RNA Viruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. First-in-Human Phase I Clinical Trial of an SFV-Based RNA Replicon Cancer Vaccine against HPV-Induced Cancers.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A de MareDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Molecular Virology Section, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
A J A Lambeck
J Regts
G M van Dam
H W Nijman
H Snippe
J Wilschut
T Daemen
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLTarget (United States) · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination with recombinant viral vectors may be impeded by preexisting vector-specific immunity or by vector-specific immunity induced during the priming immunization. It is assumed that virus-neutralizing antibodies represent the principal effector mechanism of vector-specific immunity, while killing of infected cells by vector-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) has also been suggested. Using recombinant Semliki Forest virus (rSFV) expressing E6E7 antigen from human papillomavirus, we demonstrate that secondary immune responses against E6E7 are neither affected by vector-specific antibodies nor by CTL-mediated killing of infected cells. Instead, the presence of the antigen during the prime immunization appeared to be the main determinant for the boosting efficacy. After priming with rSFVeE6,7, a homologous booster stimulated the primed E6E7-specific CTL response and induced long-lasting memory. Passively transferred SFV-neutralizing antibodies did not inhibit E6E7-specific CTL responses, although transgene expression was strongly reduced under these conditions. Conversely, in mice primed with irrelevant rSFV, induction of E6E7-specific CTLs was inhibited presumably due to vector-specific responses induced by the priming immunization. When during the priming with irrelevant rSFV, E7-protein was co-administered, the inhibitory effect of vector-specific immunity was abolished. These results suggest that, apart from vector-specific antibodies or killing of infected cells, T-cell competition may be involved in determining the efficacy of viral vector-based prime-boost immunization regimens.

Indexed as

Immunization, SecondaryAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalDNA-Binding ProteinsDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicFemaleFlow CytometryGene ExpressionGenetic TherapyImmunity, CellularImmunologic MemoryLuciferasesLymphocyte CountMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLAntibodies, MonoclonalDNA-Binding ProteinsE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 18E7 protein, Human papillomavirus type 18LuciferasesOncogene Proteins, ViralVaccines, SyntheticViral VaccinesVirosomes

Identifiers

PMID18004406
OpenAlexW1975982210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.