Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18000881›Full record

ArticleCell motility and the cytoskeleton2008

Modulation of actin mechanics by caldesmon and tropomyosin.

M J Greenberg, C-L A Wang, W Lehman, J R Moore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell motility and the cytoskeleton, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sensing the shape of a surface by tightly surface-bound filaments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Twist response of actin filaments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-speed AFM reveals subsecond dynamics of cardiac thin filaments upon CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M J GreenbergDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
C-L A Wang
W Lehman
J R Moore
Boston University · USBoston Biomedical Research Institute · US

Funding

X-ray Crystallographic Investigation of Smooth Muscle RegulationP01AR041637 · NIAMS · BOSTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI TAO, TERENCE · 1992 to 2007
$15.1M
Structure-Function of the CytoskeletonP01HL086655 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MORGAN, KATHLEEN G · 2007 to 2011
$8.8M
Thin Filaments and Muscle RegulationR37HL036153 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LEHMAN, WILLIAM J · 2008 to 2017
$4.1M
Molecular Mechanics of Mutant Cardiac MyosinR01HL077280 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL · PI MOORE, JEFFREY R · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL077280NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL086655NHLBI NIH HHS P01HL086655NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL077280NHLBI NIH HHS R37 HL036153NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR041637NIAMS NIH HHS P01-AR41637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of cells to sense and respond to physiological forces relies on the actin cytoskeleton, a dynamic structure that can directly convert forces into biochemical signals. Because of the association of muscle actin-binding proteins (ABPs) may affect F-actin and hence cytoskeleton mechanics, we investigated the effects of several ABPs on the mechanical properties of the actin filaments. The structural interactions between ABPs and helical actin filaments can vary between interstrand interactions that bridge azimuthally adjacent actin monomers between filament strands (i.e. by molecular stapling as proposed for caldesmon) or, intrastrand interactions that reinforce axially adjacent actin monomers along strands (i.e. as in the interaction of tropomyosin with actin). Here, we analyzed thermally driven fluctuations in actin's shape to measure the flexural rigidity of actin filaments with different ABPs bound. We show that the binding of phalloidin increases the persistence length of actin by 1.9-fold. Similarly, the intrastrand reinforcement by smooth and skeletal muscle tropomyosins increases the persistence length 1.5- and 2- fold respectively. We also show that the interstrand crosslinking by the C-terminal actin-binding fragment of caldesmon, H32K, increases persistence length by 1.6-fold. While still remaining bound to actin, phosphorylation of H32K by ERK abolishes the molecular staple (Foster et al. 2004. J Biol Chem 279;53387-53394) and reduces filament rigidity to that of actin with no ABPs bound. Lastly, we show that the effect of binding both smooth muscle tropomyosin and H32K is not additive. The combination of structural and mechanical studies on ABP-actin interactions will help provide information about the biophysical mechanism of force transduction in cells.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAllosteric RegulationAnimalsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsChickensMicrofilament ProteinsMuscle, SmoothPhosphorylationProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryTropomyosinActinsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsMicrofilament ProteinsTropomyosin

Identifiers

PMID18000881
PMCPMC2975105
OpenAlexW2165255509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.