Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18000668›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2007

[Modern therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus].

R Fischer-Betz, M Schneider

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R Fischer-BetzKlinik für Endokrinologie, Diabetologie und Rheumatologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. Rebecca.Fischer@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
M Schneider

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though no new treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been approved in over 40 years, the treatment possibilities have expanded decisively in this time. The available evidence for most forms of therapy is rather thin, yet there is a wide consensus on an individual immunosuppressive therapy that is adjusted to the illness activity and severity. Various new substances, e.g. other immunosuppressants and anti-cell therapies have been tested, mostly in open studies. Considering the experience in other indications, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab have a very promising potential to be approved for therapy of SLE. Aside from these, "old medications" such as antimalarial drugs still possess a high value. Besides the effective suppression of the illness activity, this is especially decisive for the improvement of the long-term prognosis, the treatment of co-morbidities and secondary prevention and the avoidance of negative effects of the illness and therapy, such as infections, osteoporosis, and premature arteriosclerosis. As these "simple" measures often remain disregarded in modern therapy, they will be focused on in this overview on the current treatment concepts for SLE and these aspects will be discussed in greater depth. With regard to new future therapies, we refer the reader to other current publications.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntimalarialsClinical Trials as TopicCyclophosphamideDrug Therapy, CombinationEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMycophenolic AcidRituximabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntimalarialsCyclophosphamideImmunosuppressive AgentsMycophenolic AcidRituximab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.