ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2007
Roles and responsibilities of family physicians on geriatric health care teams: Health care team members' perspectives.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance payment challenges for family physician program.Journal of education and health promotion · 2020Article
- Mixed method evaluation of Relational Team Development (RELATED) to improve team-based care for complex patients with mental illness in primary care.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- Designing the relational team development intervention to improve management of mental health in primary care using iterative stakeholder engagement.BMC family practice · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Interprofessional faculty development: integration of oral health into the geriatric diabetes curriculum, from theory to practice.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2013Article
- Leadership in rural medicine: the organization on thin ice?Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2011Article
- Norwegian GPs' participation in multidisciplinary meetings: a register-based study from 2007.BMC health services research · 2010Article
- Partnership disengagement from primary community care networks (PCCNs): a qualitative study for a national demonstration project.BMC health services research · 2010Article
- Factors associated with physician self-efficacy in mental illness management and team-based care.General hospital psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the beliefs and attitudes of FPs and health care professionals (HCPs) regarding FPs' roles and responsibilities on interdisciplinary geriatric health care teams.
designQualitative study using focus groups.
settingCalgary Health Region.
participantsSeventeen FPs and 22 HCPs working on geriatric health care teams.
methodFour 90-minute focus groups were conducted with FPs, followed by 2 additional 90-minute focus groups with HCPs. The FP focus groups discussed 4 vignettes of typical teamwork scenarios. Discussions were transcribed and the 4 researchers analyzed and coded themes and subthemes and developed the HCP focus group questions. These questions asked about HCPs' expectations of FPs on teams, experiences with FPs on teams, and perspectives on optimal roles on teams. Several meetings were held to determine themes and subthemes. MAIN
findingsFamily physicians identified patient centredness, role delineation for team members, team dynamics, and team structure as critical to team success. Both FPs and HCPs had a continuum of beliefs about the role FPs should play on teams, including whether FPs should be autonomous or collaborative decision makers, the extent to which FPs should work within or outside teams, whether FPs should be leaders or simply members of teams, and the level of responsibility implied or explicit in their roles.
conclusionComments from FPs and HCPs identified intraprofessional and interprofessional tensions that could affect team practice and impede the development of high-functioning teams. It will be important, as primary care reform continues, to help FPs and HCPs learn how to work together effectively on teams so that patients receive the best possible care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
18000273PMC2231491W1930972890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.