Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17999966›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2008

Fusarium and Candida albicans biofilms on soft contact lenses: model development, influence of lens type, and susceptibility to lens care solutions.

Yoshifumi Imamura, Jyotsna Chandra, Pranab K Mukherjee, Ali Abdul Lattif, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Eric Pearlman, Jonathan H Lass, Kerry O'Donnell, Mahmoud A Ghannoum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fusarium spp.: infections and intoxications.GMS infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Immunity to pathogenic fungi in the eye.Seminars in immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Modern Technologies in Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2023
    Review
  12. Microbial Adherence to Contact Lenses andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Medical Relevance ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yoshifumi ImamuraCenter for Medical Mycology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Jyotsna Chandra
Pranab K Mukherjee
Ali Abdul Lattif
Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn
Eric Pearlman
Jonathan H Lass
Kerry O'Donnell
Mahmoud A Ghannoum

Funding

TUMOR METABOLISM PROGRAMP30CA043703 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK R CHANCE · 1987 to 2026
$142.3M
TISSUE CULTURE AND HYBRIDOMA MODULEP30EY011373 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Irina A Pikuleva · 1997 to 2026
$17.7M
Identification of early phase C. albicans biofilm proteinsR01DE017486 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GHANNOUM, MAHMOUD A · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Biology and Drug Resistance of Candida BiofilmsR01DE013932 · NIDCR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GHANNOUM, MAHMOUD A · 2002 to 2005
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA043703NCI NIH HHS P30CA43703-12NEI NIH HHS P30 EY011373NEI NIH HHS P30 EY11373NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013932NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017486NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017486-01A1NIDCR NIH HHS R01DE 13932-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal keratitis is commonly caused by Fusarium species and less commonly by Candida species. Recent outbreaks of Fusarium keratitis were associated with contact lens wear and with ReNu with MoistureLoc contact lens care solution, and biofilm formation on contact lens/lens cases was proposed to play a role in this outbreak. However, no in vitro model for contact lens-associated fungal biofilm has been developed. In this study, we developed and characterized in vitro models of biofilm formation on various soft contact lenses using three species of Fusarium and Candida albicans. The contact lenses tested were etafilcon A, galyfilcon A, lotrafilcon A, balafilcon A, alphafilcon A, and polymacon. Our results showed that clinical isolates of Fusarium and C. albicans formed biofilms on all types of lenses tested and that the biofilm architecture varied with the lens type. Moreover, differences in hyphal content and architecture were found between the biofilms formed by these fungi. We also found that two recently isolated keratitis-associated fusaria formed robust biofilms, while the reference ATCC 36031 strain (recommended by the International Organization for Standardization guidelines for testing of disinfectants) failed to form biofilm. Furthermore, using the developed in vitro biofilm model, we showed that phylogenetically diverse planktonic fusaria and Candida were susceptible to MoistureLoc and MultiPlus. However, Fusarium biofilms exhibited reduced susceptibility against these solutions in a species- and time-dependent manner. This in vitro model should provide a better understanding of the biology and pathogenesis of lens-related fungal keratitis.

Indexed as

Contact Lens SolutionsBiofilmsCandida albicansContact Lenses, HydrophilicCulture MediaFusariumHumansKeratitisMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataPolymersSequence Analysis, DNAContact Lens SolutionsCulture MediaPolymers

Identifiers

PMID17999966
PMCPMC2223913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.