Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17999363›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2007

Multifactor dimensionality reduction-phenomics: a novel method to capture genetic heterogeneity with use of phenotypic variables.

H Mei, M L Cuccaro, E R Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H MeiBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
M L Cuccaro
E R Martin
University of Miami · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

USE OF DNA PROBE FOR CHOLINERGIC AND NON-CHOLINERGIC MG ANTIGENP01NS026630 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PERICAK-VANCE, MARGARET A. · 1989 to 2009
$12.6M
Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology of AutismR01NS036768 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PERICAK-VANCE, MARGARET A. · 1997 to 2006
$9.3M
Revealing Epistasis in Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG020135 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, EDEN R. · 2002 to 2006
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020135NIA NIH HHS R01 AG20135NINDS NIH HHS NS26630NINDS NIH HHS NS36768NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS026630NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complex human diseases do not have a clear inheritance pattern, and it is expected that risk involves multiple genes with modest effects acting independently or interacting. Major challenges for the identification of genetic effects are genetic heterogeneity and difficulty in analyzing high-order interactions. To address these challenges, we present MDR-Phenomics, a novel approach based on the multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) method, to detect genetic effects in pedigree data by integration of phenotypic covariates (PCs) that may reflect genetic heterogeneity. The P value of the test is calculated using a permutation test adjusted for multiple tests. To validate MDR-Phenomics, we compared it with two MDR-based methods: (1) traditional MDR pedigree disequilibrium test (PDT) without consideration of PCs (MDR-PDT) and (2) stratified phenotype (SP) analysis based on PCs, with use of MDR-PDT with a Bonferroni adjustment (SP-MDR). Using computer simulations, we examined the statistical power and type I error of the different approaches under several genetic models and sampling scenarios. We conclude that MDR-Phenomics is more powerful than MDR-PDT and SP-MDR when there is genetic heterogeneity, and the statistical power is affected by sample size and the number of PC levels. We further compared MDR-Phenomics with conditional logistic regression (CLR) for testing interactions across single or multiple loci with consideration of PC. The results show that CLR with PC has only slightly smaller power than does MDR-Phenomics for single-locus analysis but has considerably smaller power for multiple loci. Finally, by applying MDR-Phenomics to autism, a complex disease in which multiple genes are believed to confer risk, we attempted to identify multiple gene effects in two candidate genes of interest--the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) and the integrin beta 3 gene (ITGB3) on chromosome 17. Analyzing four markers in SLC6A4 and four markers in ITGB3 in 117 white family triads with autism and using sex of the proband as a PC, we found significant interaction between two markers--rs1042173 in SLC6A4 and rs3809865 in ITGB3.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationModels, GeneticChromosome MappingGenetic Diseases, InbornGenotypeHumansModels, TheoreticalPhenotypeRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID17999363
PMCPMC2276344
OpenAlexW2081111689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.