Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17999360›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2007

Type 2 NF1 deletions are highly unusual by virtue of the absence of nonallelic homologous recombination hotspots and an apparent preference for female mitotic recombination.

Katharina Steinmann, David N Cooper, Lan Kluwe, Nadia A Chuzhanova, Cornelia Senger, Eduard Serra, Conxi Lazaro, Montserrat Gilaberte, Katharina Wimmer, Viktor-Felix Mautner and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Gene-Pseudogene Inversions as a Hidden Source of Missing Heritability.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. AtypicalGenes · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Katharina SteinmannInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
David N Cooper
Lan Kluwe
Nadia A Chuzhanova
Cornelia Senger
Eduard Serra
Conxi Lazaro
Montserrat Gilaberte
Katharina Wimmer
Viktor-Felix Mautner
Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Cardiff University · GBUniversität Ulm · DEInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstitut Municipal d'Assistència Sanitària · ESMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Central Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 5% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) exhibit gross deletions that encompass the NF1 gene and its flanking regions. The breakpoints of the common 1.4-Mb (type 1) deletions are located within low-copy repeats (NF1-REPs) and cluster within a 3.4-kb hotspot of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). Here, we present the first comprehensive breakpoint analysis of type 2 deletions, which are a second type of recurring NF1 gene deletion. Type 2 deletions span 1.2 Mb and are characterized by breakpoints located within the SUZ12 gene and its pseudogene, which closely flank the NF1-REPs. Breakpoint analysis of 13 independent type 2 deletions did not reveal any obvious hotspots of NAHR. However, an overrepresentation of polypyrimidine/polypurine tracts and triplex-forming sequences was noted in the breakpoint regions that could have facilitated NAHR. Intriguingly, all 13 type 2 deletions identified so far are characterized by somatic mosaicism, which indicates a positional preference for mitotic NAHR within the NF1 gene region. Indeed, whereas interchromosomal meiotic NAHR occurs between the NF1-REPs giving rise to type 1 deletions, NAHR during mitosis appears to occur intrachromosomally between the SUZ12 gene and its pseudogene, thereby generating type 2 deletions. Such a clear distinction between the preferred sites of mitotic versus meiotic NAHR is unprecedented in any other genomic disorder induced by the local genomic architecture. Additionally, 12 of the 13 mosaic type 2 deletions were found in females. The marked female preponderance among mosaic type 2 deletions contrasts with the equal sex distribution noted for type 1 and/or atypical NF1 deletions. Although an influence of chromatin structure was strongly suspected, no sex-specific differences in the methylation pattern exhibited by the SUZ12 gene were apparent that could explain the higher rate of mitotic recombination in females.

Indexed as

Sequence DeletionAdolescentAdultCarrier ProteinsChromosomes, Human, Pair 17FemaleHumansMaleMitosisMosaicismNeoplasm ProteinsNeurofibromatosis 1Neurofibromin 1Nuclear ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 2Recombination, GeneticCarrier ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNeurofibromin 1Nuclear ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 2SUZ12 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID17999360
PMCPMC2276354
OpenAlexW2013959668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.