ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2007
[Anaphylaxis. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Modern allergy diagnostic procedures and their clinical application].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is an acute systemic hypersensitivity reaction with symptoms of immediate-type allergy, which involves particularly the skin, respiratory tract, cardiovascular system and gastrointestinal tract. The severity of anaphylactic reactions is variable but some are fatal. Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis affects about 3% and food hypersensitivity 2.6-3.2% of the general population; drugs are the other frequent cause. Symptoms of anaphylaxis are characteristic, but none of them is obligatory--even urticaria is absent in about 10%--and each symptom may be found also in other conditions. Hence, there are numerous differential diagnostic considerations, and anaphylaxis may be overlooked in many cases. Diagnosis of anaphylaxis is based on the occurrence of characteristic symptoms, especially when they develop upon exposure to a potential trigger. It can be significantly supported by evidence of release of mediators in the course of the reaction. For clinical purposes, demonstration of an increase of mast cell tryptase serum concentration above the individual baseline value is useful. The correct diagnosis of anaphylaxis is not only important with regard to treatment of an acute reaction, but also for subsequent allergologic diagnostics and long-term management of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17999042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.