ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2007
Mitochondrial matR sequences help to resolve deep phylogenetic relationships in rosids.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of complete mitogenomes of two ornamental plants Chimonanthus salicifolius and Chimonanthus praecox in the family Calycanthaceae.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.BMC biology · 2025Article
- New insights into the phylogenetic relationships within the Lauraceae from mitogenomes.BMC biology · 2024Article
- The first two whole mitochondrial genomes for the genus Dactylis species: assembly and comparative genomics analysis.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of plastomes in Oxalidaceae: Phylogenetic relationships and potential molecular markers.Plant diversity · 2021Article
- Homology-Aware Phylogenomics at Gigabase Scales.Systematic biology · 2017Article
- Single-Copy Genes as Molecular Markers for Phylogenomic Studies in Seed Plants.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- The changing epitome of species identification - DNA barcoding.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2014Review
- The American cranberry: first insights into the whole genome of a species adapted to bog habitat.BMC plant biology · 2014Article
- Impact of gene molecular evolution on phylogenetic reconstruction: a case study in the rosids (Superorder Rosanae, Angiosperms).PloS one · 2014Article
- Advances in the floral structural characterization of the major subclades of Malpighiales, one of the largest orders of flowering plants.Annals of botany · 2013Review
- A phylogenetic analysis of the brassicales clade based on an alignment-free sequence comparison method.Frontiers in plant science · 2012Article
- Article
- A functional phylogenomic view of the seed plants.PLoS genetics · 2011Article
- The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca).Nature genetics · 2011Article
- The worldwide holoparasitic Apodanthaceae confidently placed in the Cucurbitales by nuclear and mitochondrial gene trees.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Using phylogenomic patterns and gene ontology to identify proteins of importance in plant evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRosids are a major clade in the angiosperms containing 13 orders and about one-third of angiosperm species. Recent molecular analyses recognized two major groups (i.e., fabids with seven orders and malvids with three orders). However, phylogenetic relationships within the two groups and among fabids, malvids, and potentially basal rosids including Geraniales, Myrtales, and Crossosomatales remain to be resolved with more data and a broader taxon sampling. In this study, we obtained DNA sequences of the mitochondrial matR gene from 174 species representing 72 families of putative rosids and examined phylogenetic relationships and phylogenetic utility of matR in rosids. We also inferred phylogenetic relationships within the "rosid clade" based on a combined data set of 91 taxa and four genes including matR, two plastid genes (rbcL, atpB), and one nuclear gene (18S rDNA).
resultsComparison of mitochondrial matR and two plastid genes (rbcL and atpB) showed that the synonymous substitution rate in matR was approximately four times slower than those of rbcL and atpB; however, the nonsynonymous substitution rate in matR was relatively high, close to its synonymous substitution rate, indicating that the matR has experienced a relaxed evolutionary history. Analyses of our matR sequences supported the monophyly of malvids and most orders of the rosids. However, fabids did not form a clade; instead, the COM clade of fabids (Celastrales, Oxalidales, Malpighiales, and Huaceae) was sister to malvids. Analyses of the four-gene data set suggested that Geraniales and Myrtales were successively sister to other rosids, and that Crossosomatales were sister to malvids.
conclusionCompared to plastid genes such as rbcL and atpB, slowly evolving matR produced less homoplasious but not less informative substitutions. Thus, matR appears useful in higher-level angiosperm phylogenetics. Analysis of matR alone identified a novel deep relationship within rosids, the grouping of the COM clade of fabids and malvids, which was not resolved by any previous molecular analyses but recently suggested by floral structural features. Our four-gene analysis supported the placements of Geraniales, Myrtales at basal nodes of the rosid clade and placed Crossosomatales as sister to malvids. We also suggest that the core part of rosids should include fabids, malvids and Crossosomatales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.