ArticleNeuro-oncology2008
Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
109 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Surgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: a multicenter perspective from the Italian society of neurosurgery (SINchNeurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Surgical management of Glioma Grade 4: technical update from the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®): a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Pooled it
- The effect of levetiracetam treatment on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- The diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of ASL, DSC-MRI and DKI in the grading of cerebral gliomas: a meta-analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Survival Outcomes Following Reoperation in Recurrent Glioblastoma: Time to Consider the Timing of Reoperation.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Pooled it
- Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Clinical, molecular, and immunologic determinants of survival in WHO-defined IDH-wildtype glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy: a large real-world cohort study.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of outcome, recurrence patterns, and dosimetry in glioblastoma patients treated according to RTOG versus EORTC contouring guidelines.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Longitudinal analysis of radiologic progression patterns in glioblastoma: investigating prognosis using a multi-state model.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio dynamics: prognostic value and potential for surveilling glioblastoma recurrence.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Profiles of survival prediction in glioblastoma.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Multiple surgical resections for progressive IDH wildtype glioblastoma-is it beneficial?Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Post-craniotomy coronal suture diastases in a transformed lower grade glioma.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Cognitive functioning is prognostic in patients with IDH1-wild type and MGMT-unmethylated high-grade gliomas.Croatian medical journal · 2023Article
- Article
- The Impact of ioMRI on Glioblastoma Resection and Clinical Outcomes in a State-of-the-Art Neuro-Oncological Setup.Cancers · 2023Article
- Distribution and favorable prognostic implication of genomic EGFR alterations in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Investigating chromosomal instability in long-term survivors with glioblastoma and grade 4 astrocytoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable data on large cohorts of patients with glioblastoma are needed because such studies differ importantly from trials that have a strong bias toward the recruitment of younger patients with a higher performance status. We analyzed the outcome of 676 patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma who were treated consecutively at a single institution over a 7-year period (1997-2003) with follow-up to April 30, 2006. Survival probabilities were 57% at 1 year, 16% at 2 years, and 7% at 3 years. Progression-free survival was 15% at 1 year. Prolongation of survival was significantly associated with surgery in patients with a good performance status, whatever the patient's age, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.55 (p < 0.001) or a 45% relative decrease in the risk of death. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved survival, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.61 (p = 0.001) and 0.89 (p = 0.04), respectively, regardless of age, performance status, or residual tumor volume. Recurrence occurred in 99% of patients throughout the follow-up. Reoperation was performed in one-fourth of these patients but was not effective, whether performed within 9 months (hazard ratio, 0.86; p = 0.256) or after 9 months (hazard ratio, 0.98; p = 0.860) of initial surgery, whereas second-line chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) or with temozolomide improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; p = 0.008). Surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be considered in all patients with glioblastoma, and these treatments should not be withheld because of increasing age alone. The benefit of second surgery at recurrence is uncertain, and new trials are needed to assess its effectiveness. Chemotherapy with PCV or temozolomide seems to be a reasonable option at tumor recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.