Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17993568›Full record

ReviewEukaryotic cell2008

Response to iron deprivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Caroline C Philpott, Olga Protchenko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eukaryotic cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Iron acquisition strategies of the rock-inhabiting fungusApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Inhibitory effect of copper chelators on the budding inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Role of the putativeMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Cell differentiation controls iron assimilation in a choanoflagellate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline C PhilpottLiver Diseases Branch, National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 9B-16, 10 Center Drive, MSC 1800, Bethesda, MD 20892-1800, USA. carolinep@intra.niddk.nih.gov
Olga Protchenko

Funding

Eukaryotic Heme UtilizationZIADK054513 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI PHILPOTT, CAROLINE · 2009 to 2015
$1.7M
Eukaryotic Heme UtilizationZ01DK054513 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI PHILPOTT, CAROLINE · 2007 to 2008
$617k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Biological TransportIronSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSiderophoresIronSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSiderophores

Identifiers

PMID17993568
PMCPMC2224162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.