Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17993485›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2008

In silico protein fragmentation reveals the importance of critical nuclei on domain reassembly.

Lydia M Contreras Martínez, Ernesto E Borrero Quintana, Fernando A Escobedo, Matthew P DeLisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lydia M Contreras MartínezSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Ernesto E Borrero Quintana
Fernando A Escobedo
Matthew P DeLisa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein complementation assays (PCAs) based on split protein fragments have become powerful tools that facilitate the study and engineering of intracellular protein-protein interactions. These assays are based on the observation that a given protein can be split into two inactive fragments and these fragments can reassemble into the original properly folded and functional structure. However, one experimentally observed limitation of PCA systems is that the folding of a protein from its fragments is dramatically slower relative to that of the unsplit parent protein. This is due in part to a poor understanding of how PCA design parameters such as split site position in the primary sequence and size of the resulting fragments contribute to the efficiency of protein reassembly. We used a minimalist on-lattice model to analyze how the dynamics of the reassembly process for two model proteins was affected by the location of the split site. Our results demonstrate that the balanced distribution of the "folding nucleus," a subset of residues that are critical to the formation of the transition state leading to productive folding, between protein fragments is key to their reassembly.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationProtein EngineeringProtein FoldingAmino Acid SequenceGenetic Complementation TestMolecular Sequence DataPeptide FragmentsProtein DenaturationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryThermodynamicsPeptide FragmentsProteins

Identifiers

PMID17993485
PMCPMC2242749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.