Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17990793›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2008

Exploring the native human antibody repertoire to create antiviral therapeutics.

S K Dessain, S P Adekar, J D Berry

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Prophylaxis and therapy for Chikungunya virus infection.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2009
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S K DessainCardeza Foundation for Hematologic Research, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Curtis Building 812, 1015 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. scott.dessain@jefferson.edu
S P Adekar
J D Berry
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

Human Monoclonal Antibodies that Bind Botulinum ToxinsR01AI065967 · NIAID · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DESSAIN, SCOTT KENDALL · 2006 to 2014
$3.9M
Pathogenesis of Thrombosis in HIT/TR01HL081503 · NHLBI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI REILLY, MICHAEL P · 2006 to 2009
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL081503NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI065967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native human antibodies are defined as those that arise naturally as the result of the functioning of an intact human immune system. The utility of native antibodies for the treatment of human viral diseases has been established through experience with hyperimmune human globulins. Native antibodies, as a class, differ in some respects from those obtained by recombinant library methods (phage or transgenic mouse) and possess distinct properties that may make them ideal therapeutics for human viral diseases. Methods for cloning native human antibodies have been beset by technical problems, yet many antibodies specific for viral antigens have been cloned. In the present review, we discuss native human antibodies and ongoing improvements in cloning methods that should facilitate the creation of novel, potent antiviral therapeutics obtained from the native human antibody repertoire.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralCell FusionCloning, MolecularHumansHybridomasImmunoglobulins, IntravenousVirus DiseasesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulins, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID17990793
PMCPMC7121815
OpenAlexW70541150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.