ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2008
Long-term assessment of the implant titanium material--artificial saliva interface.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Simulated Body Fluids for Dental Implant Corrosion: A Practical Guide.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Evaluation of surface roughness of titanium disks subjected to simulated oral conditions.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Stability of plasma electrolytic oxidation coating on titanium in artificial saliva.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2013Article
- Functionalization of titanium based metallic biomaterials for implant applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2011Article
- Biocompatibility of orthodontic bands following exposure to dental plaque.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2011Article
- In vitro biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of a new implant titanium base alloy.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2010Article
- Biological nano-functionalization of titanium-based biomaterial surfaces: a flexible toolbox.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper studies the long-term (20,000 exposure hours) behavior of titanium and Ti-5Al-4V alloy-Carter-Brugirard saliva interface and the short-term (500 exposure hours) resistance of titanium and Ti-5Al-4V alloy-Tani&Zucchi saliva interface. Potentiodynamic polarization method was applied for the determination of the main electrochemical parameters. Linear polarization measurements for to obtain the corrosion rates were used. Monitoring of the open circuit potentials (E(oc)) for long-term have permitted to calculate the potential gradients due to the pH, DeltaE(oc)(pH) and to the saliva composition DeltaE(oc)(c) changes which can appear "in vivo" conditions and can generate local corrosion. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has analyzed the surface roughness. Ion release was studied by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). In Carter-Brugirard saliva both titanium and Ti-5Al-4V alloy present very stable passive films, long-term stability, "very good" resistance, low values of the open circuit potential gradients, which cannot generate local corrosion. In Tani&Zucchi artificial saliva, pitting corrosion and noble pitting protection potentials (which cannot be reached in oral cavity) were registered; titanium ion release is very low; surface roughness increase in time and in the presence of the fluoride ions, denoting some increase in the anodic activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.