ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008
Evaluation of a new assay in comparison with reverse hybridization and sequencing methods for hepatitis C virus genotyping targeting both 5' noncoding and nonstructural 5b genomic regions.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliable resolution of ambiguous hepatitis C virus genotype 1 results with the Abbott HCV Genotype Plus RUO assay.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A Single-step Multiplex Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Hepatitis C Virus Genotypes.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2017Article
- HCV genotyping from NGS short reads and its application in genotype detection from HCV mixed infected plasma.PloS one · 2015Article
- A reliable multiplex genotyping assay for HCV using a suspension bead array.Microbial biotechnology · 2015Article
- HCV core antigen and HCV-RNA in HIV/HCV co-infected patients with different HCV genotypes.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Article
- The first complete genome sequence of HCV-1a from Pakistan and a phylogenetic analysis with complete genomes from the rest of the world.Virology journal · 2013Article
- Recombination in hepatitis C virus.Viruses · 2011Review
- Article
- Hepatitis C virus genotyping using an oligonucleotide microarray based on the NS5B sequence.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 subtype identification in new HCV drug development and future clinical practice.PloS one · 2009Article
- Complete genome of a European hepatitis C virus subtype 1g isolate: phylogenetic and genetic analyses.Virology journal · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping. The assay design is such that genotype 1 isolates are typed by amplification targeting the nonstructural 5b (NS5b) subgenomic region. Non-genotype 1 isolates are typed by type-specific amplicon detection in the 5' noncoding region (5'NC) (method 1; HCV genotyping analyte-specific reagent assay). This method was compared with 5'NC reverse hybridization (method 2; InnoLiPA HCV II) and 5'NC sequencing (method 3; Trugene HCV 5'NC). Two hundred ninety-five sera were tested by method 1; 223 of them were also typed by method 2 and 89 by method 3. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of an NS5b fragment were used to resolve discrepant results. Suspected multiple-genotype infections were confirmed by PCR cloning and pyrosequencing. Even though a 2% rate of indeterminates was obtained with method 1, concordance at the genotype level with results with methods 2 and 3 was high. Among eight discordant results, five mixed infections were confirmed. Genotype 1 subtyping efficiencies were 100%, 77%, and 74% for methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; there were 11/101 discordants between methods 1 and 2 (method 1 was predominantly correct) and 2/34 between methods 2 and 3. Regarding genotype 2, subtyping efficiencies were 100%, 45%, and 92% by methods 1, 2, and 3, respectively; NS5b sequencing of discordants (16/17) revealed a putative new subtype within genotype 2 and that most subtype calls were not correct. Although only sequencing-based methods provide the possibility of identifying new variants, the real-time PCR method is rapid, straightforward, and simple to interpret, thus providing a good single-step alternative to more-time-consuming assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.