ReviewHeredity2008
Advances in Bayesian multiple quantitative trait loci mapping in experimental crosses.
Review in Heredity, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide Association Study for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-step Bayesian Approach in Hanwoo Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2014Article
- QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2013Article
- An integrated hierarchical Bayesian model for multivariate eQTL mapping.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012Article
- Article
- In silico genotyping of the maize nested association mapping population.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2011Article
- Statistical analysis of genetic interactions.Genetics research · 2010Review
- Article
- Article
- Mapping main, epistatic and sex-specific QTL for body composition in a chicken population divergently selected for low or high growth rate.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Mapping interacting QTL for count phenotypes using hierarchical Poisson and binomial models: an application to reproductive traits in mice.Genetics research · 2010Article
- A variational Bayes algorithm for fast and accurate multiple locus genome-wide association analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Look before you leap: a new approach to mapping QTL.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2009Article
- Mapping multiple quantitative trait loci under Bayes error control.Genetics research · 2009Article
- Hierarchical generalized linear models for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping.Genetics · 2009Article
- Article
- Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping.Genetics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many complex human diseases and traits of biological and/or economic importance are determined by interacting networks of multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) and environmental factors. Mapping QTL is critical for understanding the genetic basis of complex traits, and for ultimate identification of genes responsible. A variety of sophisticated statistical methods for QTL mapping have been developed. Among these developments, the evolution of Bayesian approaches for multiple QTL mapping over the past decade has been remarkable. Bayesian methods can jointly infer the number of QTL, their genomic positions and their genetic effects. Here, we review recently developed and still developing Bayesian methods and associated computer software for mapping multiple QTL in experimental crosses. We compare and contrast these methods to clearly describe the relationships among different Bayesian methods. We conclude this review by highlighting some areas of future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.