Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17986716›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women Study: cohort study.

Gillian K Reeves, Kirstin Pirie, Valerie Beral, Jane Green, Elizabeth Spencer, Diana Bull, Million Women Study Collaboration

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 636 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
636citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
33.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02663973 completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Evaluation of Breast Cancer at Brazilian Institutions - Project AMAZONA III

TypeobservationalSponsorLatin American Cooperative Oncology GroupRan2016 to 2021Enrolled3,000ConditionsBreast Cancer
NCT03391401 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Microbiome-based Prognostical Biomarkers in Patients With Morbid Obesity and Bariatric Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorSt. Franziskus HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled204ConditionsObesity, Morbid, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, NAFLD, MicrobiomeArmsBariatric surgery
NCT05604950 completednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorYongtao HanRan2009 to 2022Enrolled2ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Esophagectomy, Radiotherapy, ChemotherapyArmsSince the data were collected retrospectively, there were no interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

636 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,494 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Trial

576 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gillian K ReevesCancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF. gill.reeves@ceu.ox.ac.uk
Kirstin Pirie
Valerie Beral
Jane Green
Elizabeth Spencer
Diana Bull
Million Women Study Collaboration
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relation between body mass index (kg/m2) and cancer incidence and mortality.

designProspective cohort study.

participants1.2 million UK women recruited into the Million Women Study, aged 50-64 during 1996-2001, and followed up, on average, for 5.4 years for cancer incidence and 7.0 years for cancer mortality.

main outcome measuresRelative risks of incidence and mortality for all cancers, and for 17 specific types of cancer, according to body mass index, adjusted for age, geographical region, socioeconomic status, age at first birth, parity, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, years since menopause, and use of hormone replacement therapy.

results45,037 incident cancers and 17 203 deaths from cancer occurred over the follow-up period. Increasing body mass index was associated with an increased incidence of endometrial cancer (trend in relative risk per 10 units=2.89, 95% confidence interval 2.62 to 3.18), adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus (2.38, 1.59 to 3.56), kidney cancer (1.53, 1.27 to 1.84), leukaemia (1.50, 1.23 to 1.83), multiple myeloma (1.31, 1.04 to 1.65), pancreatic cancer (1.24, 1.03 to 1.48), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (1.17, 1.03 to 1.34), ovarian cancer (1.14, 1.03 to 1.27), all cancers combined (1.12, 1.09 to 1.14), breast cancer in postmenopausal women (1.40, 1.31 to 1.49) and colorectal cancer in premenopausal women (1.61, 1.05 to 2.48). In general, the relation between body mass index and mortality was similar to that for incidence. For colorectal cancer, malignant melanoma, breast cancer, and endometrial cancer, the effect of body mass index on risk differed significantly according to menopausal status.

conclusionsIncreasing body mass index is associated with a significant increase in the risk of cancer for 10 out of 17 specific types examined. Among postmenopausal women in the UK, 5% of all cancers (about 6000 annually) are attributable to being overweight or obese. For endometrial cancer and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus, body mass index represents a major modifiable risk factor; about half of all cases in postmenopausal women are attributable to overweight or obesity.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAge DistributionAlcohol DrinkingEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaternal AgeMiddle AgedNeoplasmsObesityParityPregnancySmokingSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17986716
PMCPMC2099519
OpenAlexW2113017183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.