Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17986075›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2007

The UCLan community engagement and service user support (Comensus) project: valuing authenticity, making space for emergence.

Soo Downe, Mick McKeown, Eileen Johnson, Comensus Community Involvement Team, Comensus Advisory Group, Lidia Koloczek, Angela Grunwald, Lisa Malihi-Shoja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A theoretical systematic review of patient involvement in health and social care education.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Community Engagement in a complex intervention to improve access to primary mental health care for hard-to-reach groups.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soo DowneUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancs., UK. sdowne@uclan.ac.uk
Mick McKeown
Eileen Johnson
Comensus Community Involvement Team
Comensus Advisory Group
Lidia Koloczek
Angela Grunwald
Lisa Malihi-Shoja

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and evaluate service user, carer and community involvement in health and social care education.

backgroundDespite the high policy profile of involvement issues, there appear to be no published accounts of schemes that have used a systematic whole-faculty approach to community engagement in health and social care higher education. FOCUS OF THIS PAPER: The set up and early development of a faculty-wide community engagement project. SETTING AND

participantsStaff from the faculty of health in one University, local service users and carers and community group project workers and local National Health Service (NHS) and public sector staff.

designParticipatory action research including document review, field notes, questionnaires and interviews. ANALYSIS: Thematic analysis. The emerging themes were tested by seeking disconfirming data, and through verification with stake-holders.

resultsPrior to the study, there were examples of community engagement in the participating faculty, but they occurred in specific departments, and scored low on the 'ladder of involvement'. Some previous attempts at engagement were perceived to have failed, resulting in resistance from staff and the community. Despite this, an advisory group was successfully formed, and project framing and development evolved with all stake-holders over the subsequent year. The four themes identified in this phase were: building accessibility; being 'proper' service users/carers;moving from suspicion to trust: mutually respectful partnerships as a basis for sustainable change; and responses to challenge and emergence.

conclusionsSuccessful and sustainable engagement requires authenticity. Many problems and solutions arising from authentic engagement are emergent, and potentially challenging to organizations.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesCommunity Health ServicesHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID17986075
PMCPMC5060412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.