ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
Screening HIV in pregnancy: a survey of prenatal care patients.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen in Canada, as in the rest of the world, represent an increasing proportion of new HIV positive cases. In 2002, women accounted for 25% of all positive HIV tests reported in Canada; with the majority being in their childbearing years (15 to 39 years), perinatal transmission of HIV in Canada is cause for concern. Following the development of interventions that can effectively reduce vertical transmission rate, prenatal screening of HIV has become the first and most pivotal step in the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. The purpose of this study was to assess how women's knowledge and attitudes regarding HIV and HIV screening in pregnancy influence screening rates.
methodA prospective anonymous survey of 231 women attending antenatal care clinics at a teaching university hospital or in a community clinic was conducted.
resultsIn general, pregnant women supported universal HIV screening in the prenatal period. Women who previously had been tested for HIV and who did not perceive that they were at risk for contracting HIV were more likely to decline HIV testing in their current pregnancy. Overall knowledge regarding HIV and its transmission is less than optimal, particularly among those women who declined HIV testing.
conclusionKnowledge gaps exist between women accepting and declining prenatal HIV screening, particularly relating to benefits of screening. These results suggest that efforts have to continue to be put into educating the public but also, importantly, into changing current attitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17985679PMC6976025W1486552615What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.