ArticleCurrent microbiology2008
Rapid detection of oculopathogenic adenovirus in conjunctivitis.
Article in Current microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- An automated and high-throughput approach for enhanced precision of adenoviral titering.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Possible viral agents to consider in the differential diagnosis of blepharoconjunctivitis.World journal of virology · 2024Article
- [Research progress on etiologic diagnosis of ocular viral diseases].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2020Review
- Molecular identification of adenoviruses associated with respiratory infection in Egypt from 2003 to 2010.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Article
- Etiology of maculopapular rash in measles and rubella suspected patients from Belarus.PloS one · 2014Article
- A treatment protocol for minimizing duration and complications of adenoviral epidemic keratoconjunctivitis.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocular adenovirus (Ad) infections occur throughout the world in both sporadic and epidemic forms. Accurate laboratory diagnosis of Ad in conjunctival samples is always valuable. The present study was carried out to explore the presence of Ad as a causative agent in clinically suspected viral conjunctivitis and to compare the performance of conventional virus isolation on cell cultures, direct detection of Ad antigens in conjunctival cells by a direct fluorescence assay, Ad DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and specific IgM measurement by ELISA. Samples included scrapes from conjunctiva. Scrapes were subjected to study by direct immunofluorescence stain, culture on the Hep-2 cell line, and PCR for Ad detection. Blood samples were also taken and subjected to study for specific anti-Ad IgM determination. The culture for Ad was positive in 77.8%, direct antigen detection by fluorescent stain was positive in 72.2%, PCR was positive in 83.3%, and serology was positive in 88.9% of patients. Both determination of antibody IgM and PCR correctly identified a larger group of patients compared to cell culture. The most sensitive and specific method for diagnosis of Ad compared to culture was PCR (100%), followed by IgM detection (92.9%) then direct antigen detection by fluorescent stain (85.8%). From this study, we conclude that Ad is a common pathogen in sporadic cases of conjunctivitis. Screening of adenoviral conjunctivitis is possible by using specific IgM due to its high sensitivity. A confirmatory test can be done by PCR for diagnosis of Ad, as it is a rapid, specific, and accurate method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.