Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17985145›Full record

ArticleActa neuropathologica2008

Twenty-first century brain banking. Processing brains for research: the Columbia University methods.

Jean Paul G Vonsattel, Maria Pilar Del Amaya, Christian E Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clonal CD8Nature immunology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain donation rules in Italy and worldwide: overview of a cutting-edge topic for human brain research.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CD33 and SHP-1/Genes · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean Paul G VonsattelThe Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, The Department of Pathology in the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, USA. jgv2001@columbia.edu
Maria Pilar Del Amaya
Christian E Keller

Funding

Satellite Diagnostic and Treatment Clinic CoreP50AG008702 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 1989 to 2019
$46.3M
VASCULAR FACTORS AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AND ALZHEIMER'S DISEASEP01AG007232 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI LUCHSINGER, JOSE ALEJANDRO · 1989 to 2008
$21.7M
Genetic Epidemiology of Alzheimer's Disease in HispanicsR37AG015473 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD P · 2004 to 2013
$10.8M
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE IN HISPANICSR01AG015473 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MAYEUX, RICHARD · 1999 to 2003
$4.6M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG007232NIA NIH HHS P01-AG07232NIA NIH HHS P50 AG008702NIA NIH HHS P50-AG08702NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015473NIA NIH HHS R37 AG015473NIA NIH HHS R37-AG15473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carefully categorized postmortem human brains are crucial for research. The lack of generally accepted methods for processing human postmortem brains for research persists. Thus, brain banking is essential; however, it cannot be achieved at the cost of the teaching mission of the academic institution by routing brains away from residency programs, particularly when the autopsy rate is steadily decreasing. A consensus must be reached whereby a brain can be utilizable for diagnosis, research, and teaching. The best diagnostic categorization possible must be secured and the yield of samples for basic investigation maximized. This report focuses on integrated, novel methods currently applied at the New York Brain Bank, Columbia University, New York, which are designed to reach accurate neuropathological diagnosis, optimize the yield of samples, and process fresh-frozen samples suitable for a wide range of modern investigations. The brains donated for research are processed as soon as possible after death. The prosector must have a good command of the neuroanatomy, neuropathology, and the protocol. One half of each brain is immersed in formalin for performing the thorough neuropathologic evaluation, which is combined with the teaching task. The contralateral half is extensively dissected at the fresh state. The anatomical origin of each sample is recorded using the map of Brodmann for the cortical samples. The samples are frozen at -160 degrees C, barcode labeled, and ready for immediate disbursement once categorized diagnostically. A rigorous organization of freezer space, coupled to an electronic tracking system with its attached software, fosters efficient access for retrieval within minutes of any specific frozen samples in storage. This report describes how this achievement is feasible with emphasis on the actual processing of brains donated for research.

Indexed as

BrainInformation SystemsResearchAutopsyBrain DiseasesHumansNeuroanatomyPostmortem ChangesTissue BanksTissue PreservationUniversities

Identifiers

PMID17985145
PMCPMC2292479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.