Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17982477›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2008

Contribution of the active metabolite M1 to the pharmacological activity of tesofensine in vivo: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling approach.

T Lehr, A Staab, C Tillmann, E Ø Nielsen, D Trommeshauser, H G Schaefer, C Kloft

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Obesity medications in development.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Understanding the hysteresis loop conundrum in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2014
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

T LehrDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Institute of Pharmacy, Berlin, Germany.
A Staab
C Tillmann
E Ø Nielsen
D Trommeshauser
H G Schaefer
C Kloft
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DENeuroSearch (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTesofensine is a centrally acting drug under clinical development for Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and obesity. In vitro, the major metabolite of tesofensine (M1) displayed a slightly higher activity, which however has not been determined in vivo. The aims of this investigation were (i) to simultaneously accomplish a thorough characterization of the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tesofensine and M1 in mice and (ii) to evaluate the potency (pharmacodynamics, PD) and concentration-time course of the active metabolite M1 relative to tesofensine and their impact in vivo using the PK/PD modelling approach. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Parent compound, metabolite and vehicle were separately administered intravenously and orally over a wide dose range (0.3-20 mg kg(-1)) to 228 mice. Concentrations of tesofensine and M1 were measured; inhibition of the dopamine transporter was determined by co-administration of [(3)H]WIN35,428 as the pharmacodynamic measure. KEY

resultsPharmacokinetics of tesofensine and M1 were best described by one-compartment models for both compounds. Nonlinear elimination and metabolism kinetics were observed with increasing dose. The PK/PD relationship was described by an extended E(max) model. Effect compartments were used to resolve observed hysteresis. EC(50) values of M1, as an inhibitor of the dopamine transporter, were 4-5-fold higher than those for tesofensine in mice. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The lower potency of M1 together with approximately 8-fold higher through steady-state concentrations suggest that M1 did contribute to the overall activity of tesofensine in mice.

Indexed as

AnimalsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCentral Nervous System AgentsComputer SimulationDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleMiceModels, BiologicalBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCentral Nervous System AgentsDopamine Plasma Membrane Transport ProteinsTesofensine

Identifiers

PMID17982477
PMCPMC2199391
OpenAlexW2024785639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.