Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17981842›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2008

The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata.

Konstantinos Liolios, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Nektarios Tavernarakis, Nikos C Kyrpides

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome sequence ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017
    Article
  5. Complete genome sequence ofStandards in genomic sciences · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantinos LioliosUniversity of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Genome Biology Program, Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, USA.
Konstantinos Mavromatis
Nektarios Tavernarakis
Nikos C Kyrpides

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) is a comprehensive resource that provides information on genome and metagenome projects worldwide. Complete and ongoing projects and their associated metadata can be accessed in GOLD through pre-computed lists and a search page. As of September 2007, GOLD contains information on more than 2900 sequencing projects, out of which 639 have been completed and their sequence data deposited in the public databases. GOLD continues to expand with the goal of providing metadata information related to the projects and the organisms/environments towards the Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence' (MIGS) guideline. GOLD is available at http://www.genomesonline.org and has a mirror site at the Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Crete, Greece at http://gold.imbb.forth.gr/

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidGenomicsEnvironmental MicrobiologyGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyInternetUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID17981842
PMCPMC2238992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.