Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17981087›Full record

ReviewTrends in molecular medicine2007

Right on target: eradicating leukemic stem cells.

Daniela S Krause, Richard A Van Etten

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in molecular medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The relevance of mJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. RBFOX2 recognizes NNature cell biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RNA NClinical and translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Functions of RNA NBiomarker research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela S KrauseDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Richard A Van Etten
Massachusetts General Hospital · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

STUDIES OF BCR/ABL LEUKEMOGENESIS IN MICER01CA090576 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI VAN ETTEN, RICHARD A. · 2001 to 2021
$5.9M
Pathogenesis &Therapy of 8p11 Leukemia/LymphomaR01CA105043 · NCI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI VAN ETTEN, RICHARD A. · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA090576NCI NIH HHS CA105043NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090576NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Less than a third of adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are cured by current treatments, emphasizing the need for new approaches to therapy. The discovery over a decade ago that myeloid leukemias originate from rare stem-like cells that can transfer the disease to immunodeficient mice suggested that these 'leukemia stem cells' (LSCs) are responsible for relapse of leukemia following conventional or targeted cancer therapy and that eradication of LSCs might be necessary to cure the disease permanently. Several recent studies have provided insight into the signaling pathways underlying the LSC phenotype and have also described approaches to eliminate LSCs with antibodies. Here, we review recent advances in LSC research and discuss novel therapeutic strategies to specifically target LSCs.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsHumansLeukemiaLeukemia, MyeloidMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplastic Stem CellsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID17981087
PMCPMC4344828
OpenAlexW2147863207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.