Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17980021›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2007

Training pediatric health care providers in prevention of dental decay: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Gary D Slade, R Gary Rozier, Leslie P Zeldin, Peter A Margolis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00464009 (Development and Evaluation of a Medical Intervention for Early Childhood Caries), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00464009 nacompletednot on this map

Development and Evaluation of a Medical Intervention for Early Childhood Caries

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2001 to 2007Enrolled120ConditionsEarly Childhood Dental CariesArmsContinuing medical education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gary D SladeAustralian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. gary.slade@adelaide.edu.au
R Gary Rozier
Leslie P Zeldin
Peter A Margolis

Funding

PREVENTION OF EARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES IN MEDICAL PRACTICER01DE013949 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROZIER, RICHARD GARY · 2001 to 2005
$2.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013949NIDCR NIH HHS R01-DE13949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians report willingness to provide preventive dental care, but optimal methods for their training and support in such procedures are not known. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three forms of continuing medical education (CME) on provision of preventive dental services to Medicaid-enrolled children by medical personnel in primary care physician offices.

methodsPractice-based, randomized controlled trial.

setting1,400 pediatric and family physician practices in North Carolina providing care to an estimated 240,000 Medicaid-eligible children aged 0-3 years.

interventionsGroup A practices (n = 39) received didactic training and course materials in oral health screening, referral, counseling and application of fluoride varnish. Group B practices (n = 41) received the same as Group A and were offered weekly conference calls providing advice and support. Group C practices (n = 41) received the same as Group B and were offered in-office visit providing hands-on advice and support. In all groups, physicians were reimbursed $38-$43 per preventive dental visit. Outcome measures were computed from reimbursement claims submitted to NC Division of Medical Assistance. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: rate of preventive dental services provision per 100 well-child visits. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURE: % of practices providing 20 or more preventive dental visits.

results121 practices were randomized, and 107 provided data for analysis. Only one half of Group B and C practices took part in conference calls or in-office visits. Using intention-to-treat analysis, rates of preventive dental visits did not differ significantly among CME groups: GroupA = 9.4, GroupB = 12.9 and GroupC = 8.5 (P = 0.32). Twenty or more preventive dental visits were provided by 38-49% of practices in the three study groups (P = 0.64).

conclusionA relatively high proportion of medical practices appear capable of adopting these preventive dental services within a one year period regardless of the methods used to train primary health care providers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00464009

Indexed as

MedicaidProgram EvaluationAttitude of Health PersonnelChild, PreschoolDental Care for ChildrenDental CariesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFamily PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNorth CarolinaPediatric DentistryPediatricsPreventive DentistrySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17980021
PMCPMC2190767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.