Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17978098›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2008

Distinct roles for two Galpha-Gbeta interfaces in cell polarity control by a yeast heterotrimeric G protein.

Shelly C Strickfaden, Peter M Pryciak

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell biology of yeast zygotes, from genesis to budding.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chemical gradients and chemotropism in yeast.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2009
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shelly C StrickfadenDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA.
Peter M Pryciak
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

YEAST PHEROMONE SIGNAL TRANSDUCTIONR01GM057769 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PRYCIAK, PETER M · 1997 to 2023
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM57769NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating pheromones trigger dissociation of a heterotrimeric G protein (Galphabetagamma) into Galpha-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and Gbetagamma. The Gbetagamma dimer regulates both mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade signaling and cell polarization. Here, by independently activating the MAP kinase pathway, we studied the polarity role of Gbetagamma in isolation from its signaling role. MAP kinase signaling alone could induce cell asymmetry but not directional growth. Surprisingly, active Gbetagamma, either alone or with Galpha-GTP, could not organize a persistent polarization axis. Instead, following pheromone gradients (chemotropism) or directional growth without pheromone gradients (de novo polarization) required an intact receptor-Galphabetagamma module and GTP hydrolysis by Galpha. Our results indicate that chemoattractant-induced cell polarization requires continuous receptor-Galphabetagamma communication but not modulation of MAP kinase signaling. To explore regulation of Gbetagamma by Galpha, we mutated Gbeta residues in two structurally distinct Galpha-Gbeta binding interfaces. Polarity control was disrupted only by mutations in the N-terminal interface, and not the Switch interface. Incorporation of these mutations into a Gbeta-Galpha fusion protein, which enforces subunit proximity, revealed that Switch interface dissociation regulates signaling, whereas the N-terminal interface may govern receptor-Galphabetagamma coupling. These findings raise the possibility that the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer can function in a partially dissociated state, tethered by the N-terminal interface.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAllelesGTP-Binding Protein alpha SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein beta SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein gamma SubunitsGuanosine TriphosphateHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsHydrolysisModels, BiologicalMutationPhenotypePheromonesProtein BindingReceptors, PheromoneRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeGTP-Binding Protein alpha SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein beta SubunitsGTP-Binding Protein gamma SubunitsGuanosine TriphosphateHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPheromonesReceptors, PheromoneRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17978098
PMCPMC2174166
OpenAlexW2111642295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.