Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17978016›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2007

Neurobiology of escalated aggression and violence.

Klaus A Miczek, Rosa M M de Almeida, Edward A Kravitz, Emilie F Rissman, Sietse F de Boer, Adrian Raine

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The Healthy Brains and Behavior Study: objectives, design, recruitment, and population coverage.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2013
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How dopamine guides our social world.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex Differences in Social Cognition.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Forest Manners Exchange: Forest as a Place to Remedy Risky Behaviour of Adolescents: Mixed Methods Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Klaus A MiczekDepartment of Psychology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA. klaus.miczek@tufts.edu
Rosa M M de Almeida
Edward A Kravitz
Emilie F Rissman
Sietse F de Boer
Adrian Raine
Harvard University · USTufts University · USUniversidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos · BRUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Behavioral Neurobiology of Aggression: Alcohol, GABA, and 5-HTR01AA013983 · NIAAA · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI WEERA, MARCUS MATTHIAS · 2003 to 2022
$8.0M
Psychomotor Stimulants and Aggression in AnimalsR01DA002632 · NIDA · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI MICZEK, KLAUS A · 1985 to 2008
$3.4M
Intergenerational Transmission of Antisocial BehaviorR01HD042259 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RAINE, ADRIAN · 2001 to 2005
$2.8M
Sex chromosome effects on neural and behavioral differentiationR01NS055218 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI RISSMAN, EMILIE F. · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA013983NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA013983NICHD NIH HHS HD42259NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042259NIDA NIH HHS DA02632NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002632NINDS NIH HHS NS055218NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS055218PHS HHS NIGMS 067645PHS HHS NIGMS 072411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychopathological violence in criminals and intense aggression in fruit flies and rodents are studied with novel behavioral, neurobiological, and genetic approaches that characterize the escalation from adaptive aggression to violence. One goal is to delineate the type of aggressive behavior and its escalation with greater precision; second, the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and brainstem structures emerge as pivotal nodes in the limbic circuitry mediating escalated aggressive behavior. The neurochemical and molecular work focuses on the genes that enable invertebrate aggression in males and females and genes that are expressed or suppressed as a result of aggressive experiences in mammals. The fruitless gene, immediate early genes in discrete serotonin neurons, or sex chromosome genes identify sexually differentiated mechanisms for escalated aggression. Male, but not female, fruit flies establish hierarchical relationships in fights and learn from previous fighting experiences. By manipulating either the fruitless or transformer genes in the brains of male or female flies, patterns of aggression can be switched with males using female patterns and vice versa. Work with Sts or Sry genes suggests so far that other genes on the X chromosomes may have a more critical role in female mouse aggression. New data from feral rats point to the regulatory influences on mesocortical serotonin circuits in highly aggressive animals via feedback to autoreceptors and via GABAergic and glutamatergic inputs. Imaging data lead to the hypothesis that antisocial, violent, and psychopathic behavior may in part be attributable to impairments in some of the brain structures (dorsal and ventral PFC, amygdala, and angular gyrus) subserving moral cognition and emotion.

Indexed as

NeurobiologyViolenceAggressionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainHumansSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID17978016
PMCPMC2667097
OpenAlexW1994158001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.