Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17977991›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Specimen dilution improves sensitivity of the amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test for smear microscopy-positive respiratory specimens.

Renata L Guerra, James F Baker, Roya Alborz, Derek T Armstrong, Julia A Kiehlbauch, Marcus B Conde, Susan E Dorman, Nancy M Hooper

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis From Patients Who Are Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Negative.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renata L GuerraJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
James F Baker
Roya Alborz
Derek T Armstrong
Julia A Kiehlbauch
Marcus B Conde
Susan E Dorman
Nancy M Hooper

Funding

Rapid diagnostics for TBU19AI045432 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHECHTER, MAURO · 1999 to 2009
$7.3M
Innovative approaches for tuberculosis control in BrazilU2RTW006883 · FIC · FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO · PI LAPA E SILVA, JOSE ROBERTO · 2005 to 2015
$3.5M
Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosisK23AI051528 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DORMAN, SUSAN E · 2003 to 2007
$657k
ABC TRAINING GRANT FOR RIO DE JANEIRO ICIDRD43TW005574 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAISSON, RICHARD E · 2000 to 2004
$551k
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW005574FIC NIH HHS D43 TW05574-01FIC NIH HHS U2R TW006883NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI051528NIAID NIH HHS K23AI51528NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI045432NIAID NIH HHS U19AI45432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specimen dilution has been proposed as a strategy to minimize amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct (MTD) test inhibition (N. Pollock, J. Westerling, and A. Sloutsky, Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 126:142-147, 2006; A. Sloutsky, L. L. Han, and B. G. Werner, J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1547-1551, 2004). We evaluated the impact of respiratory specimen dilution on MTD test accuracy in a public health laboratory. The difference in MTD test sensitivity between the dilution and conventional methods was 15.9% (P = 0.001) for smear microscopy-positive specimens and -3.6% (P = 0.38) for smear microscopy-negative specimens.

Indexed as

Body FluidsHumansMicroscopyMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID17977991
PMCPMC2224278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.