Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17976292›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2007

Triadic communication in the primary care paediatric consultation: a review of the literature.

Patricia Cahill, Alexia Papageorgiou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Health-related internet use among adolescents with uncontrolled persistent asthma.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Communication strategies to encourage child participation in an oral health promotion session: An exemplar video observational study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Observational
  16. Creating a communication space in the healthcare context: Children's perspective of using the eHealth service, Sisom.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2021
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patricia CahillThe Norwich Road Surgery, Ipswich, Suffolk. patriciacahill@doctors.org.uk
Alexia Papageorgiou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren aged 6-12 years are usually seen in primary care with an adult carer. It is a government and professional priority for doctors to try and involve these children in their medical consultations.

aimTo ascertain the evidence available on the amount and type of involvement that children in the 6-12 year age group have in their primary care consultations when the consultation was held with a child, a GP, and an adult. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Literature review.

methodData sources included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC, The Cochrane library, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Wilson's Social Science abstracts, hand searching for references, and contact with authors.

resultsTwenty-one studies were selected for inclusion in the study. Children were found to have little quantitative involvement in their own consultations. They may take part during information gathering but are unlikely to participate in the treatment planning and discussion parts of the consultation.

conclusionChildren in the 6-12 year age group have little meaningful involvement in their consultations.

Indexed as

CommunicationFamily PracticePatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID17976292
PMCPMC2169315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.