Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17974969›Full record

ArticleCancer research2007

Differing Src signaling levels have distinct outcomes in Drosophila.

Marcos Vidal, Stephen Warner, Renee Read, Ross L Cagan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Apoptosis inhibition restrains primary malignant traits in differentFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Modelling Cooperative Tumorigenesis inBioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Invadosomes in their natural habitat.European journal of cell biology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcos VidalBrookdale Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Stephen Warner
Renee Read
Ross L Cagan
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

A Drosophila Model for Src-Mediated OncogenesisR01CA109730 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAGAN, ROSS LEIGH · 2004 to 2013
$2.9M
A DROSOPHILA MODEL FOR MEN2B AND SPORADIC MTCR01CA084309 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAGAN, ROSS LEIGH · 2000 to 2009
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA084309NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109730NCI NIH HHS R01CA109730NCI NIH HHS R01CA84309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High levels of Src activity are found in a broad spectrum of cancers. The roles of Src and its negative regulator Csk have been extensively studied, although results have often proved contradictory or the relevance to whole organisms is unclear. In Drosophila, overexpression of either Src orthologue resulted in apoptotic cell death, but paradoxically, reducing dCsk activity led to over-proliferation and tissue overgrowth. Here, we show that in Drosophila epithelia in situ, the levels of Src signaling determine the cellular outcome of Src activation. Apoptotic cell death was triggered specifically at high Src signaling levels; lower levels directed antiapoptotic signals while promoting proliferation. Furthermore, our data indicate that expression of kinase-dead Src isoforms do not necessarily act as dominant-negative factors, but can instead increase Src pathway activity, most likely by titrating Csk activity away from endogenous Src. The importance of Src activity levels was emphasized when we examined oncogenic cooperation between Src and Ras: malignant overgrowth was observed specifically when high Src signaling levels were achieved. We propose a model in which low levels of Src signaling promote survival and proliferation during early stages of tumorigenesis, whereas strong Src signaling, coupled with antiapoptotic signals, directs invasive migration and metastasis during advanced tumor stages.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell MovementCell ProliferationDrosophilaGenes, rasNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)Signal Transductionsrc-Family KinasesMatk protein, mouseProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src)src-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID17974969
PMCPMC2892182
OpenAlexW2155255760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.