Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17974502›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2008

Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework.

Beverly B Green, James D Ralston, Paul A Fishman, Sheryl L Catz, Andrea Cook, Jim Carlson, Lynda Tyll, David Carrell, Robert S Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Adherence to blood pressure telemonitoring in a cluster-randomized clinical trial.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2012
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Telemedicine and M-Health in Hypertension Management: Technologies, Applications and Clinical Evidence.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly B GreenGroup Health Permanente, Seattle, WA, USA. green.b@ghc.org
James D Ralston
Paul A Fishman
Sheryl L Catz
Andrea Cook
Jim Carlson
Lynda Tyll
David Carrell
Robert S Thompson
Group Health Cooperative · USHealth Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Long-Term Outcomes and Costs of Web-Based Hypertension Care (e-BPLT)R01HL075263 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2004 to 2012
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075263NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075263-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials have provided unequivocal evidence that treatment of hypertension decreases mortality and major disability from cardiovascular disease; however, blood pressure remains inadequately treated in most affected individuals. This large gap continues despite the facts that more than 90% of adults with hypertension have health insurance, and hypertension is the leading cause of visits to the doctor. New approaches are needed to improve hypertension care.

objectivesThe Electronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (e-BP) study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether care based on the Chronic Care Model and delivered over the Internet improves hypertension care. The primary study outcomes are systolic, diastolic, and blood pressure control; secondary outcomes are medication adherence, patient self-efficacy, satisfaction and quality of life, and healthcare utilization and costs.

methodsHypertensive patients receiving care at Group Health medical centers are eligible if they have uncontrolled blood pressure on two screening visits and access to the Web and an e-mail address. Study participants are randomly assigned to three intervention groups: (a) usual care; (b) home blood pressure monitoring receipt and proficiency training on its use and the Group Health secure patient website (with secure e-mail access to their healthcare provider, access to a shared medical record, prescription refill and other services); or (c) this plus pharmacist care management (collaborative care management between the patient, the pharmacist, and the patient's physician via a secure patient website and the electronic medical record).

conclusionWe will determine whether a new model of patient-centered care that leverages Web communications, self-monitoring, and collaborative care management improves hypertension control. If this model proves successful and cost-effective, similar interventions could be used to improve the care of large numbers of patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Indexed as

Medical Records Systems, ComputerizedPatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeTelemedicineAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareElectronic MailFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionInternetAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID17974502
PMCPMC2645352
OpenAlexW2033345161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.