ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1991
The change in the threshold for short-term desensitization in isolated smooth muscle cells showing an all-or-none response to acetylcholine.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- All-or-none augmentation of Ca2+ sensitivity in alpha-toxin-permeabilized single smooth muscle cells from guinea-pig taenia caecum.British journal of pharmacology · 1995Article
- Receptor-coupled shortening of alpha-toxin-permeabilized single smooth muscle cells from the guinea-pig stomach.British journal of pharmacology · 1992Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. Isolated smooth muscle cells from guinea-pig taenia caecum were prepared by collagenase digestion. The cells showed an all-or-none response to acetylcholine (ACh) under our experimental conditions. 2. Desensitized cells showed an all-or-none response but required a higher concentration of ACh for induction of contraction, indicating that the desensitization was due to a change in the threshold concentration. 3. In [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]-QNB) binding to the desensitized cells, KD and Bmax were not significantly different from those estimated in the control cells. The competitive inhibition curve for specific binding of [3H]-QNB by ACh in the desensitized cells was in agreement with that of control cells. 4. The ACh-stimulated increase of the 45Ca2+ influx was very rapid and correlated well with the contraction of the cells. The concentrations of ACh inducing the maximal 45Ca2+ influx were increased by desensitization. 5. These results indicated that although the binding of ACh to the receptor was not changed by desensitization, the threshold concentration of ACh for their contraction was raised by desensitization, and the 45Ca2+ influx accompanying the contraction was shifted to the side of high concentration of ACh. 6. These results suggest that the development of short-term desensitization is due to an uncoupling of the receptor from the mechanism for initiation of the contraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.