ArticlePloS one2007
Fine-tuning enhancer models to predict transcriptional targets across multiple genomes.
Article in PloS one, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic quantification of muscle volumes in magnetic resonance imaging scans of the lower extremities.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2011Trial
- Transcription factor interactions explain the context-dependent activity of CRX binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Review
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Review
- ORTI: An Open-Access Repository of Transcriptional Interactions for Interrogating Mammalian Gene Expression Data.PloS one · 2016Article
- Identification of High-Impact cis-Regulatory Mutations Using Transcription Factor Specific Random Forest Models.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- iRegulon: from a gene list to a gene regulatory network using large motif and track collections.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- p53 shapes genome-wide and cell type-specific changes in microRNA expression during the human DNA damage response.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2014Article
- A common set of DNA regulatory elements shapes Drosophila appendages.Developmental cell · 2013Article
- Interpreting the regulatory genome: the genomics of transcription factor function in Drosophila melanogaster.Briefings in functional genomics · 2012Article
- Enhancer identification in mouse embryonic stem cells using integrative modeling of chromatin and genomic features.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Position weight matrix, gibbs sampler, and the associated significance tests in motif characterization and prediction.Scientifica · 2012Review
- Assessing computational methods of cis-regulatory module prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- Robust target gene discovery through transcriptome perturbations and genome-wide enhancer predictions in Drosophila uncovers a regulatory basis for sensory specification.PLoS biology · 2010Article
- Alignment and prediction of cis-regulatory modules based on a probabilistic model of evolution.PLoS computational biology · 2009Article
- ModuleMiner - improved computational detection of cis-regulatory modules: are there different modes of gene regulation in embryonic development and adult tissues?Genome biology · 2008Article
- Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures.Nature · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Networks of regulatory relations between transcription factors (TF) and their target genes (TG)- implemented through TF binding sites (TFBS)- are key features of biology. An idealized approach to solving such networks consists of starting from a consensus TFBS or a position weight matrix (PWM) to generate a high accuracy list of candidate TGs for biological validation. Developing and evaluating such approaches remains a formidable challenge in regulatory bioinformatics. We perform a benchmark study on 34 Drosophila TFs to assess existing TFBS and cis-regulatory module (CRM) detection methods, with a strong focus on the use of multiple genomes. Particularly, for CRM-modelling we investigate the addition of orthologous sites to a known PWM to construct phyloPWMs and we assess the added value of phylogenentic footprinting to predict contextual motifs around known TFBSs. For CRM-prediction, we compare motif conservation with network-level conservation approaches across multiple genomes. Choosing the optimal training and scoring strategies strongly enhances the performance of TG prediction for more than half of the tested TFs. Finally, we analyse a 35(th) TF, namely Eyeless, and find a significant overlap between predicted TGs and candidate TGs identified by microarray expression studies. In summary we identify several ways to optimize TF-specific TG predictions, some of which can be applied to all TFs, and others that can be applied only to particular TFs. The ability to model known TF-TG relations, together with the use of multiple genomes, results in a significant step forward in solving the architecture of gene regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.