ArticleEMBO reports2007
The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors.
Article in EMBO reports, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?PLoS biology · 2018Pooled it
- Gendered male and high-income country authors dominate publication at a One Health research organization.PloS one · 2026Article
- Biomedical and life science articles by female researchers spend longer under review.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Do Manuscripts by Female Evolutionary Biologists Spend Longer Under Review?Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Twenty-Five Years of Progress-Lessons Learned From JMIR Publications to Address Gender Parity in Digital Health Authorships: Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Article
- Over twenty years of publications in Ecology: Over-contribution of women reveals a new dimension of gender bias.PloS one · 2024Article
- The Issue of Gender Bias Represented in Authorship in the Fields of Exercise and Rehabilitation: A 5-Year Research in Indexed Journals.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Article
- Understanding International Differences in Academic Author Order in General Medicine Publications.Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal · 2023Article
- Modeling COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics: A Bibliometric Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Detecting anomalous referencing patterns in PubMed papers suggestive of author-centric reference list manipulation.Scientometrics · 2022Article
- Perceptions of Scientific Authorship Revisited: Country Differences and the Impact of Perceived Publication Pressure.Science and engineering ethics · 2022Article
- Article
- Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis.BMJ open · 2021Article
- On credit and credibility: Guest authors, ghostwriters, and everyone else in between.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions.Higher education · 2021Review
- Effect of Research Impact on Emerging Camel Husbandry, Welfare and Social-Related Awareness.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Observational
- The gender gap in commenting: Women are less likely than men to comment on (men's) published research.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.