ReviewDer Radiologe2008
[Screening for osteoporosis].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Pitfalls and difficulties in interpretation of bone densitometry].Der Orthopade · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis affects approximately 7 million patients in Germany and severely impairs quality of life. The clinical picture, subjective complaints as well as the presence or absence of risk factors are essential to determine the individual risk profile and to decide on possible serum blood tests, osteodensitometry, and X-ray examinations. Back pain or other clinical evidence of impaired bone stability should be evaluated with X-ray studies of the spine. If osteoporosis and an increased risk of fracture are present, treatment is indicated which includes an evidence-based pharmaceutical regimen in order to increase bone stability and to lower the risk of fractures. Drug treatment with adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation and antiresorptive or osteoanabolic substances, usually for 3-5 years, should be accompanied by pain medication and neuromuscular rehabilitation to help prevent falls and maintain independence of the elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.