Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17971887›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2007

Review for librarians of evidence-based practice in nursing and the allied health professions in the United States.

Michael Kronenfeld, Priscilla L Stephenson, Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu, Elizabeth M Tweed, Eric L Sauers, Tamara C Valovich McLeod, Ruiling Guo, Henry Trahan, Kristine M Alpi, Beth Hill and 11 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Library resource discovery.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A characterization of clinical questions asked by rehabilitation therapists.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Mapping the literature of health education: 2006-2008.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010
    Article
  15. Mapping the literature of occupational therapy: an update.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010
    Article
  16. Health sciences libraries building survey, 1999-2009.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2010
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Michael KronenfeldLearning Resource Center, A. T. Still University of the Health Sciences-Arizona, 5850 East Still Circle, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA. mkronenfeld@atsu.edu
Priscilla L Stephenson
Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu
Elizabeth M Tweed
Eric L Sauers
Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Ruiling Guo
Henry Trahan
Kristine M Alpi
Beth Hill
Pamela Sherwill-Navarro
Margaret Peg Allen
Priscilla L Stephenson
Linda M Hartman
Judy Burnham
Dennis Fell
Michael Kronenfeld
Raymond Pavlick
Ellen W MacNaughton
Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu
Nan Bernstein Ratner
A.T. Still University · USAssociation of Research Libraries · USCornell University · USUniversity of Colorado Health · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of South Alabama · USG.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center · USHartford Financial Services (United States)Idaho State University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis paper provides an overview of the state of evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing and selected allied health professions and a synopsis of current trends in incorporating EBP into clinical education and practice in these fields. This overview is intended to better equip librarians with a general understanding of the fields and relevant information resources. INCLUDED PROFESSIONS: Professions are athletic training, audiology, health education and promotion, nursing, occupational therapy, physical therapy, physician assisting, respiratory care, and speech-language pathology. APPROACH: Each section provides a description of a profession, highlighting changes that increase the importance of clinicians' access to and use of the profession's knowledgebase, and a review of each profession's efforts to support EBP. The paper concludes with a discussion of the librarian's role in providing EBP support to the profession.

conclusionsEBP is in varying stages of growth among these fields. The evolution of EBP is evidenced by developments in preservice training, growth of the literature and resources, and increased research funding. Obstacles to EBP include competing job tasks, the need for additional training, and prevalent attitudes and behaviors toward research among practitioners. Librarians' skills in searching, organizing, and evaluating information can contribute to furthering the development of EBP in a given profession.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalLibrariansAllied Health OccupationsAllied Health PersonnelCurriculumEducation, NursingEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNursesProfessional RoleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17971887
PMCPMC2000778
OpenAlexW2086589423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.