Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17968318›Full record

ArticleOncogene2008

Binding to nucleophosmin determines the localization of human and chicken ARF but not its impact on p53.

S Moulin, S Llanos, S-H Kim, G Peters

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S MoulinCancer Research UK, London Research Institute, London, UK.
S Llanos
S-H Kim
G Peters
Cancer Research UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ARF tumour suppressor gene encodes a small highly basic protein whose known functions are largely determined by the amino acids encoded within the first exon. In mammals, the protein incorporates additional residues specified by an alternative reading frame in the second exon of INK4a, but this arrangement does not apply to the chicken homologue. In exploring the intracellular localization of chicken p7(ARF), we found that while the FLAG- and HA-tagged versions localize in the nucleolus, in line with mammalian ARF, the GFP-tagged version is excluded from the nucleolus. Here we show that irrespective of the source or composition of the ARF fusion proteins, versions that accumulate in the nucleolus share the ability to bind to nucleophosmin (NPM). Depletion of NPM with siRNA results in the re-location and destabilization of nucleolar forms of ARF but has little effect on the location or stability of a nucleoplasmic form of ARF. Importantly, knockdown of endogenous NPM does not impair the ability of ARF to bind to MDM2 and stabilize p53. These findings support the view that nucleolar localization determines the stability of ARF but not its primary function.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCell Line, TumorChickensHumansNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminProtein BindingTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARFTumor Suppressor Protein p53NPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminTumor Suppressor Protein p14ARFTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID17968318
OpenAlexW2077363675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.