ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2007
Model systems for understanding DNA base pairing.
Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Non-Covalent Forces in Naphthazarin-Cooperativity or Competition in the Light of Theoretical Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- High Percentage of Isomeric Human MicroRNA and Their Analytical Challenges.Non-coding RNA · 2016Article
- Bromopyridone Nucleotide Analogues, Anoxic Selective Radiosensitizing Agents That Are Incorporated in DNA by Polymerases.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2015Article
- The strength of the template effect attracting nucleotides to naked DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Dissecting the chemical interactions and substrate structural signatures governing RNA polymerase II trigger loop closure by synthetic nucleic acid analogues.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Nucleoside triphosphates--from synthesis to biochemical characterization.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- DNA interstrand cross-linking upon irradiation of aryl halide C-nucleotides.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2014Article
- Artificial genetic sets composed of size-expanded base pairs.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2013Review
- Detection of bacterial 16S rRNA using a molecular beacon-based X sensor.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2013Article
- Dissecting chemical interactions governing RNA polymerase II transcriptional fidelity.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2012Article
- Measurement and theory of hydrogen bonding contribution to isosteric DNA base pairs.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2012Article
- Surprising repair activities of nonpolar analogs of 8-oxoG expose features of recognition and catalysis by base excision repair glycosylases.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2012Article
- Molecular electrostatic potentials of DNA base-base pairing and mispairing.Journal of molecular modeling · 2012Article
- Importance of steric effects on the efficiency and fidelity of transcription by T7 RNA polymerase.Biochemistry · 2011Article
- Encoding phenotype in bacteria with an alternative genetic set.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2011Article
- Quantum chemical studies of nucleic acids: can we construct a bridge to the RNA structural biology and bioinformatics communities?The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2010Article
- Solution structure, mechanism of replication, and optimization of an unnatural base pair.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2010Article
- Probing the interaction of archaeal DNA polymerases with deaminated bases using X-ray crystallography and non-hydrogen bonding isosteric base analogues.Biochemistry · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fact that nucleic acid bases recognize each other to form pairs is a canonical part of the dogma of biology. However, they do not recognize each other well enough in water to account for the selectivity and efficiency that is needed in the transmission of biological information through a cell. Thus proteins assist in this recognition in multiple ways, and recent data suggest that these mechanisms of recognition can vary widely with context. To probe how the chemical differences of the four nucleobases are defined in various biological contexts, chemists and biochemists have developed modified versions that differ in their polarity, shape, size, and functional groups. This brief review covers recent advances in this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.