Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17967045›Full record

ReviewPLoS computational biology2007

Getting started in tiling microarray analysis.

X Shirley Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2016
    Article
  4. Current transcriptomics in pig immunity research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. TAAPP: Tiling Array Analysis Pipeline for Prokaryotes.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2011
    Article
  10. A binary search approach to whole-genome data analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Web-based analysis of (Epi-) genome data using EpiGRAPH and Galaxy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2010
    Article
  17. Generalizing moving averages for tiling arrays using combined p-value statistics.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

X Shirley LiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. xsliu@jimmy.harvard.edu

Funding

Computational Models for Mechanisms of Global Transcription RegulationR01HG004069 · NHGRI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LIU, XIAOLE SHIRLEY · 2006 to 2013
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01 HG004069-01NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBiotechnologyComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDeoxyribonucleasesHumansMiceNucleosomesOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRNA, MessengerSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedDeoxyribonucleasesNucleosomesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID17967045
PMCPMC2041964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.