Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17965838›Full record

ArticleGenetica2008

A new test for detecting ongoing selection.

Nobuyuki Inomata, Masanobu Itoh, Rumi Kondo, Miki Ohshima, Yutaka Inoue, Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nobuyuki InomataDepartment of Biology, Graduate School of Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan. ninomscb@mbox.nc.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Masanobu Itoh
Rumi Kondo
Miki Ohshima
Yutaka Inoue
Toshiyuki Takano-Shimizu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much effort has been made to search for signatures of past natural selection in DNA sequences. However, currently acting selection is rarely detected in natural populations because of its rarity, low detection power of available methods, or both. Here, we develop a new test to detect viability selection over a single generation. In this test, one specific type of chromosomes is chosen as a reference, while all other chromosomes are designated as "focal". The test compares measures of variation between two groups of "focal" chromosomes: those found in reference/focal heterozygous individuals and those found in focal/focal homozygous individuals. In the absence of selection, we do not expect differences between these two groups as long as mating is random. On the other hand, currently acting selection can cause differences in some measures of variation. We applied this test to typing data for In(2L)t inversion polymorphism in a Drosophila melanogaster population, using "standard" (non-inverted) chromosomes as the focal class. Although the frequencies of In(2L)t and standard chromosomes did not deviate from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, we found differences in allele frequency and the number of haplotypes between the two groups of standard chromosomes. This new test, in conjunction with the Hardy-Weinberg test, may shed light on how often strong selection is operating in extant populations.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesSelection, GeneticAnimalsChromosome InversionChromosomesDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene FrequencyHaplotypesInbreedingMaleProbability

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.