Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17965273›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2007

The GID1-mediated gibberellin perception mechanism is conserved in the Lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii but not in the Bryophyte Physcomitrella patens.

Ko Hirano, Masatoshi Nakajima, Kenji Asano, Tomoaki Nishiyama, Hitoshi Sakakibara, Mikiko Kojima, Etsuko Katoh, Hongyu Xiang, Takako Tanahashi, Mitsuyasu Hasebe and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
18.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 220 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The molecular structure of the master growth regulator in plants emerges into the spotlight.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ko HiranoBioscience and Biotechnology Center, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan.
Masatoshi Nakajima
Kenji Asano
Tomoaki Nishiyama
Hitoshi Sakakibara
Mikiko Kojima
Etsuko Katoh
Hongyu Xiang
Takako Tanahashi
Mitsuyasu Hasebe
Jo Ann Banks
Motoyuki Ashikari
Hidemi Kitano
Miyako Ueguchi-Tanaka
Makoto Matsuoka
Nagoya University · JPInstitute of Agrobiological Sciences · JPRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPAdvanced Science Research Center · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPNational Institute for Basic Biology · JPPurdue University West Lafayette · USThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS H23 IP001003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis thaliana, gibberellin (GA) signaling is mediated by GIBBERELLIN-INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) and DELLA proteins in collaboration with a GA-specific F-box protein. To explore when plants evolved the ability to perceive GA by the GID1/DELLA pathway, we examined these GA signaling components in the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii and the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens. An in silico search identified several homologs of GID1, DELLA, and GID2, a GA-specific F-box protein in rice, in both species. Sm GID1a and Sm GID1b, GID1 proteins from S. moellendorffii, showed GA binding activity in vitro and interacted with DELLA proteins from S. moellendorffii in a GA-dependent manner in yeast. Introduction of constitutively expressed Sm GID1a, Sm G1D1b, and Sm GID2a transgenes rescued the dwarf phenotype of rice gid1 and gid2 mutants. Furthermore, treatment with GA(4), a major GA in S. moellendorffii, caused downregulation of Sm GID1b, Sm GA20 oxidase, and Sm GA3 oxidase and degradation of the Sm DELLA1 protein. These results demonstrate that the homologs of GID1, DELLA, and GID2 work in a similar manner in S. moellendorffii and in flowering plants. Biochemical studies revealed that Sm GID1s have different GA binding properties from GID1s in flowering plants. No evidence was found for the functional conservation of these genes in P. patens, indicating that GID1/DELLA-mediated GA signaling, if present, differs from that in vascular plants. Our results suggest that GID1/DELLA-mediated GA signaling appeared after the divergence of vascular plants from the moss lineage.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBryopsidaGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGibberellinsImmunoblottingModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein BindingSelaginellaceaeSequence Homology, Amino AcidTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesGibberellinsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17965273
PMCPMC2174699
OpenAlexW2038495969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.