Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17963510›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2007

ProCKSI: a decision support system for Protein (structure) Comparison, Knowledge, Similarity and Information.

Daniel Barthel, Jonathan D Hirst, Jacek Błazewicz, Edmund K Burke, Natalio Krasnogor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fast Phylogeny of SARS-CoV-2 by Compression.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Retargeting of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cyt2Aa against hemipteran insect pests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Novel protein folds and their nonsequential structural analogs.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2008
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel BarthelASAP, School of Computer Science and IT, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK. daniel.barthel@nottingham.ac.uk
Jonathan D Hirst
Jacek Błazewicz
Edmund K Burke
Natalio Krasnogor

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C511764/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe introduce the decision support system for Protein (Structure) Comparison, Knowledge, Similarity and Information (ProCKSI). ProCKSI integrates various protein similarity measures through an easy to use interface that allows the comparison of multiple proteins simultaneously. It employs the Universal Similarity Metric (USM), the Maximum Contact Map Overlap (MaxCMO) of protein structures and other external methods such as the DaliLite and the TM-align methods, the Combinatorial Extension (CE) of the optimal path, and the FAST Align and Search Tool (FAST). Additionally, ProCKSI allows the user to upload a user-defined similarity matrix supplementing the methods mentioned, and computes a similarity consensus in order to provide a rich, integrated, multicriteria view of large datasets of protein structures.

resultsWe present ProCKSI's architecture and workflow describing its intuitive user interface, and show its potential on three distinct test-cases. In the first case, ProCKSI is used to evaluate the results of a previous CASP competition, assessing the similarity of proposed models for given targets where the structures could have a large deviation from one another. To perform this type of comparison reliably, we introduce a new consensus method. The second study deals with the verification of a classification scheme for protein kinases, originally derived by sequence comparison by Hanks and Hunter, but here we use a consensus similarity measure based on structures. In the third experiment using the Rost and Sander dataset (RS126), we investigate how a combination of different sets of similarity measures influences the quality and performance of ProCKSI's new consensus measure. ProCKSI performs well with all three datasets, showing its potential for complex, simultaneous multi-method assessment of structural similarity in large protein datasets. Furthermore, combining different similarity measures is usually more robust than relying on one single, unique measure.

conclusionBased on a diverse set of similarity measures, ProCKSI computes a consensus similarity profile for the entire protein set. All results can be clustered, visualised, analysed and easily compared with each other through a simple and intuitive interface.ProCKSI is publicly available at http://www.procksi.net for academic and non-commercial use.

Indexed as

Expert SystemsStructural Homology, ProteinAmino Acid MotifsAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularPattern Recognition, AutomatedProteinsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidUser-Computer InterfaceProteins

Identifiers

PMID17963510
PMCPMC2222653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.