Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17962917›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2008

Association between height loss and bone loss, cumulative incidence of vertebral fractures and future quality of life: the Miyama study.

N Yoshimura, H Kinoshita, T Takijiri, H Oka, S Muraki, A Mabuchi, H Kawaguchi, K Nakamura, T Nakamura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

N YoshimuraDepartment of Joint Disease Research, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. yoshimuran-ort@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp
H Kinoshita
T Takijiri
H Oka
S Muraki
A Mabuchi
H Kawaguchi
K Nakamura
T Nakamura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study aimed to clarify associations between height loss, bone loss and the quality of life (QOL) score among general inhabitants of Miyama, a rural Japanese community. This population-based epidemiological study was conducted in Miyama, a village located in a mountain area in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan.

methodsA list of all inhabitants comprising 1,543 inhabitants (716 men, 827 women) born in this village between 1910-1949 was compiled. From the above whole cohort, a subcohort to measure bone mineral density (BMD) was recruited, consisting of 400 participants, divided into four groups of 50 men and 50 women each, and stratified into age decades by decade of birth-year (1910-1919, 1920-1929, 1930-1939 or 1940-1949). BMD measurement, physical measurements of height (cm) and body weight (kg) were taken, and body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) were calculated. BMD and anthropometric measurements were repeated on the same participants at 3, 7 and 10 years after baseline measurement (1993, 1997 and 2000). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Among 299 of 400 participants, changes in height over 10 years for men in their 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s were -0.7 cm, -0.5 cm, -1.2 cm and -1.5 cm, respectively, compared with -0.7 cm, -1.4 cm, -2.1 cm and -3.7 cm in women, respectively. No significant relationships between change in height and rate of change in BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck after adjustment for age in men (lumbar spine, beta = 0.058, standard error of the mean (SE) = 0.031, P = 0.501, R(2) = 0.038; femoral neck, beta = 0.100, SE = 0.038, P = 0.228, R(2) = 0.121) were identified. By contrast, among women, a significant positive association was identified between height change and change rate of BMD at the lumbar spine after adjusting for age (beta = 0.221, SE = 0.039, P = 0.012, R(2) = 0.069), while no significant relationship was found between height change and change rate at the femoral neck (beta = 0.107, SE = 0.039, P = 0.229, R(2) = 0.048). No significant relationship was noted between vertebral fractures (VFx) and height at baseline in men and women (men: odds ratio (OR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.05, P = 0.24; women: OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08, P = 0.58) or between VFx and height loss (men: OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.00-1.71, P = 0.051; women: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.94-1.53, P = 0.14). In both men and women, no significant relationship was identified between utility of the EuroQol EQ5D questionnaire and height at baseline (men: beta = -0.148, SE = 0.003, P = 0.202, R(2) = 0.076; women: beta = 0.127, SE = 0.004, P = 0.235, R(2) = 0.048), and height change (men: beta = -0.078, SE = 0.008, P = 0.452, R(2) = 0.065; women: beta = 0.053, SE = 0.010, P = 0.608, R(2) = 0.038).

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody HeightBone DensityCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisQuality of LifeRural HealthSpinal Fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.