Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17962327›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2007

Laryngeal reflex responses are not modulated during human voice and respiratory tasks.

Victor M Henriquez, Geralyn M Schulz, Steven Bielamowicz, Christy L Ludlow

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The blink reflex and its modulation - Part 1: Physiological mechanisms.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Laryngeal Reflexes: Physiology, Technique, and Clinical Use.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor M HenriquezLaryngeal and Speech Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/NIH, 10 Center Drive MSC 1416, Bethesda, MD 20892-1416, USA.
Geralyn M Schulz
Steven Bielamowicz
Christy L Ludlow
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

THE BASES OF NORMAL AND DISORDERED LARYNGEAL AND SPEECH SYSTEMSZ01NS002980 · NINDS · NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI LUDLOW, CHRISTY LESLIE · 1999 to 2008
$3.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 NS002980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laryngeal adductor response (LAR) is a protective reflex that prevents aspiration and can be elicited either by electrical stimulation of afferents in the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) or by deflection of mechanoreceptors in the laryngeal mucosa. We hypothesized that because this reflex is life-sustaining, laryngeal muscle responses to sensory stimuli would not be suppressed during volitional laryngeal tasks when compared to quiet respiration. Unilateral electrical superior laryngeal nerve stimulation was used to elicit early (R1) and late (R2) responses in the ipsilateral thyroarytenoid muscle in 10 healthy subjects. The baseline levels of muscle activity before stimulation, R1 and R2 response occurrence and the integrals of responses were measured during each task: quiet inspiration, prolonged vowels, humming, forced inhalation and effort closure. We tested whether R1 response integrals during tasks were equal to either: (1) baseline muscle activity during the task added to the response integral at rest; (2) the response integral at rest minus the baseline muscle activity during the task; or (3) the response integral at rest. R1 response occurrence was not altered by task from rest while fewer R2 responses occurred only during effort closure and humming compared to rest. Because the R1 response integrals did not change from rest, task increases in motor neuron firing did not alter the LAR. These findings demonstrate that laryngeal motor neuron responses to sensory inputs are not gated during volitional tasks confirming the robust life-sustaining protective mechanisms provided by this airway reflex.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansLaryngeal MusclesLaryngeal NervesMaleMotor NeuronsReflexRegression AnalysisRespiratory MechanicsVoice

Identifiers

PMID17962327
PMCPMC2375523
OpenAlexW1529336030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.