Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17962325›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2007

Cajal Retzius cells in the mouse neocortex receive two types of pre- and postsynaptically distinct GABAergic inputs.

Knut Kirmse, Anton Dvorzhak, Christian Henneberger, Rosemarie Grantyn, Sergei Kirischuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cell Type-Specific Circuit Mapping Reveals the Presynaptic Connectivity of Developing Cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel GABAergic circuits mediating excitation/inhibition of Cajal-Retzius cells in the developing hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Knut KirmseInstitute of Neurophysiology, Johannes-Mueller-Center of Physiology, Charité-University-Medicine Berlin, Tucholskystrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Anton Dvorzhak
Christian Henneberger
Rosemarie Grantyn
Sergei Kirischuk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cajal-Retzius (CR) cells are principal cells of layer I in the developing neocortex. They are able to generate action potentials, make synaptic contacts in layer I and receive excitatory GABAergic inputs before birth. Although CR cells participate in neuronal network activity in layer I, the properties of their synaptic inputs are not yet characterized. We recorded miniature (mIPSCs) and evoked (eIPSCs) postsynaptic currents using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Most of CR cells displayed two types of mIPSCs, namely those with fast (mIPSC(F)) and slow (mIPSC(S)) rise kinetics. The mIPSC(F) mean amplitude was significantly larger than that of mIPSC(S), while their decay rates were not different. Peak-scaled non-stationary noise analysis revealed that mIPSC(S) and mIPSC(F) differed in their weighted single-channel conductance. In addition, zolpidem (100 nm), a modulator of alpha(1) subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors, selectively affected mIPSC(S) suggesting that different postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors mediate mIPSC(F) and mIPSC(S). eIPSCs also split into two populations with different rise kinetics. Fast eIPSCs (eIPSC(F)) displayed higher paired-pulse ratio (PPR) and lower GABA release probability than slowly rising eIPSCs (eIPSC(S)). As CGP55845, a GABA(B) receptor antagonist, eliminated the observed difference in PPR, the lower release probability at IPSC(F) connections probably reflects a stronger tonic GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition of IPSC(F) synapses. At low (0.1 Hz) stimulation frequency both inputs can effectively convert presynaptic action potentials into postsynaptic ones; however, only IPSC(F) connections reliably transfer the presynaptic activity patterns at higher stimulation rates. Thus, CR cells receive two GABAergic inputs, which differ in the quantal amplitude, the probability of GABA release and the frequency dependence of signal transfer.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyExcitatory Postsynaptic Potentialsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeocortexNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsReceptors, GABAReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Presynapticgamma-Aminobutyric AcidReceptors, GABAReceptors, GABA-AReceptors, Presynaptic

Identifiers

PMID17962325
PMCPMC2375528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.